Explosives manufacturing · Virginia

BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant

Radford, VA · ~1,119 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant runs at 46% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Explosives manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant: 1.5 TCR = 46% of Explosives manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant safety composite

BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant: 0.9 → 2.3 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 2.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.09× in 2019

BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant's TCR rose 1.4 from 0.9 in 2016 to 2.3 in 2019. In 2019, DART was 1.09× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325920 · Radford, VA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.5 · 46% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Mining Services
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~1,119 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mining Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant averages 1.5 TCR (46% of the Explosives manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant TCR series: 2016=0.9 · 2018=1.3 · 2019=2.3 · BLS 3.3

Where BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant falls in its industry

78 Explosives manufacturing establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Explosives manufacturing employers in Virginia.

BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant (1,119 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant
BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant (1,119 employees, TCR 1.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 80 employees and a TCR of 2.4

BAE Systems Inc - Radford Army Ammunition Plant has more employees than the Explosives manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 2.3 1.7 24 1 0
2018 1.3 1.1 14 0 1
2016 0.9 0.4 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325920 · VA · Radford

78 Explosives manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 43 employers in Radford, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mining Services 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR BST Manufacturing Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chemring Ordnance, Inc. 1.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nammo Perry Inc 1.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE WM 7016 1,119 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Government 1,121 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carilion Clinic New River Valley Hospital Co. 03 1,131 FTE
STATE-SIZE OKTNVAEA - AT&T Services, Inc. 1,134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kollmorgen 501 W. Main St. 333 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kollmorgen Industrial Drives (LC) KL1002 313 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2762 301 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGDS-VA03 222 FTE
NAT-TCR Hilton Garden Inn Novi 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR AMB078 Dallas 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Amcor Fairfield 1.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0027 2954 1.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE ND,FARGO - North Medical Center Campus - Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists) 1,119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nashville 1 1,119 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yuma Plant 1,119 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0557 - Oconomowoc DC 1,119 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.