Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing · Arizona
Yuma Plant
Yuma, AZ · ~1,119 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- B
- Good Safety Record
- 2.7
- Avg TCR
- 4.5
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Yuma Plant runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing workplace, earning a grade B.
Yuma Plant: 2.7 TCR = 59% of Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing BLS 4.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Yuma Plant safety composite
Yuma Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
43/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- C 2.67 per 100 workers
Safer than 56% of industry peers
- DART rate
- F 4.65 per 100 workers
Safer than 21% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−0.5
2016→2021
Yuma Plant injury rate improved
Yuma Plant's TCR fell 0.5 from 6.7 in 2016 to 6.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.74× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=6.7 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=6.3
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 115114 · Yuma, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE
Grade B · TCR 2.7 · 59% of ind
- DART 4.7 DART
- RANK #4/8
- PHOTO De Forest, WI
- BOOK 5y book
- INJ 147 inj
- SIZE ~1,119 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: De Forest, WI (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →
Yuma Plant in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Yuma Plant
2.7 TCR
- De Forest, WI
De Forest, WI
2.7 TCR
- Pioneer Hi-Bre
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. - Durant, IA SPSC
2.7 TCR
- Stamoules Prod
Stamoules Produce Company
2.7 TCR
- Stone Tree Inc
Stone Tree Incorporated
2.7 TCR
What this shows Yuma Plant averages 2.7 TCR (59% of the Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing BLS benchmark).
Yuma Plant TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=6.3 · BLS 4.5
Where Yuma Plant falls in its industry
666 Vegetable sorting, grading, an establishmentsSafer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.
Narrower to Arizona alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 8 Vegetable sorting, grading, an employers in Arizona.
Yuma Plant has more employees than the Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 6.3 | 4.7 | 26 | 9 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 21 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6.7 | 6.2 | 48 | 3 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
115114 · AZ · Yuma
666 Vegetable sorting, grading, and packing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 274 employers in Yuma, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.