Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (except infrared, ultraviolet), manufacturing · California

BAE Systems I&S San Diego

San Diego, CA · ~49 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BAE Systems I&S San Diego runs at 65% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (except infrared, ultraviolet), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

BAE Systems I&S San Diego: 2.1 TCR = 65% of Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (except infrared, ultraviolet), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BAE Systems I&S San Diego safety composite

BAE Systems I&S San Diego scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 81% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2018→2024

BAE Systems I&S San Diego injury rate improved

BAE Systems I&S San Diego's TCR fell 4.1 from 4.1 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.1 · 2019=2.0 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334510 · San Diego, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 65% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #39/51
  • PHOTO TransducerWorks
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TransducerWorks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

BAE Systems I&S San Diego in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BAE Systems I&S San Diego averages 2.1 TCR (65% of the Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (except infrared, ultraviolet), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BAE Systems I&S San Diego TCR series: 2018=4.1 · 2019=2 · 2022=4.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where BAE Systems I&S San Diego falls in its industry

242 Arc lamp units, electrotherape establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #39 safest of 51 Arc lamp units, electrotherape employers in California.

BAE Systems I&S San Diego (49 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate BAE Systems I&S San Diego
BAE Systems I&S San Diego (49 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 186 employees and a TCR of 1.1

BAE Systems I&S San Diego has fewer employees than the Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (exce median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.5 4.5 1 1 0
2019 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2018 4.1 4.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334510 · CA · San Diego

242 Arc lamp units, electrotherapeutic (except infrared, ultraviolet), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,979 employers in San Diego, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TransducerWorks 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ivy Biomedical Systems, Inc. 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brooklyn Park - Cardiac Surgery 2.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Acutus Medical, Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE LAJES FARMS INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunview Shandon 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rawah-Napa County 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Farms 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Diego Health 9,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Atomics 8,108 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health Human Services Agency 6,080 FTE
CITY-NEAR National University 4,955 FTE
NAT-TCR Daly Computers, Inc. 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sunstate Energy, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Yogi Bear's Jellystone Park: Luray 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Marina Cartage / MAT Leasing / MT Transit / Marina Xpress 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Deborah Bradley Construction & Management Services Inc. 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stagecraft Industries, Inc 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wil Fischer Distributing of Kansas 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Michigan Kenworth - Dearborn 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.