Industry profile · NAICS 334510

Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 279 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024. Average TCR uses the 242 establishments with a credible rate.

279
Employers
1.8
Avg TCR (rated)
3.3
BLS benchmark
2,736
Injuries (all)

TCR, interpreted

Below average

1.8 avg TCR

The industry picture

According to OSHA ITA filings (2016–2024), Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing ranks #522 of 540 industries with at least 100 rated employers by average Total Case Rate (higher TCR = more injuries per 100 workers). The 242 rated employers in Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing average 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 workers, below the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

#522 of 540
corpus TCR rank · ≥100 rated
1.8
avg TCR · rated subset
3.3
BLS national benchmark
242
rated employers

ITA inventory (279) and injury totals cover every reporting establishment; the average TCR is the rated subset only. Corpus rank matches /rankings/most-dangerous-industries (≥100 rated employers). BLS IIF is a separate survey population, see Methodology → Three Populations.

Where Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing sits nationally on injury rate

Average Total Case Rate, industries with ≥100 rated employers

2 Among the safest lower TCR than 96% of 540 industries

Industries, banded by average TCR

Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more industries. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count and share, and where it sits relative to this entry.

Source OSHA Injury Tracking Application (2016–2024) · 2026-08-25

Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing injury rate, 2016–2024

Industry-average TCR has fallen across this span (1.4 → 1.1) · NAICS 334510

11.21.41.6 201620172018201920202021202220232024 1.09
OSHA ITA employer_yearly, 2016-2024 · establishments with >=200,000 hours worked and a credible TCR each year (54 in the latest year shown)

What Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

According to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (2016–2024), Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing ranks #522 of 540 industries with at least 100 rated establishments by rated-subset average Total Case Rate (same basis as the most-dangerous-industries ranking; higher TCR means more injuries). The Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing sector (NAICS 334510) encompasses 279 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 2,736 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window. The industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 1.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year is computed on the 242 establishments with a credible rate (see methodology). Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 1.8 is below the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 6
EmployerLocationGradeAvg TCR
Natus San Diego CASan Diego, CAF16.3
Noah Medical - Sunnyvale LocationSunnyvale, CAF15.7
Perma-Cal Industries, Inc.Minden, NVF12.8
Zoll Medical CorporationPawtucket, RIF11.1
Pivotal Health Solutions WatertownWatertown, SDF10.0
Beta Bionics, IncIrvine, CAF8.9
Spectralytics, Inc.Dassel, MNF8.3
Boston Scientific- AlpharettaAlpharetta, GAF7.2
Beta Bionics, Inc. (Irvine, CA office)Irvine, CAD6.3
Molded Products, IncHarlan, IAD6.0
Quality Assembly and Logistics, LLCMarinette, WID5.9
Northeast ScientificWaterbury, CTD5.7
AccSys Division of Performance Controls, Inc.Pleasanton, CAD5.5
Plainfield IndianaPlainfield, IND5.5
Pyramid Time Systems, LLCMeriden, CTD5.0
Fujifilm Healthcare Americas Corporation TwinsburgTwinsburg, OHD4.8
Avante Health SolutionsSan Clemente, CAD4.8
South Dakota Partners IncClear Lake, SDD4.7
Midwest Products and EngineeringMilwaukee, WID4.6
McLaren Northern Michigan HospitalPetoskey, MID4.5
ThermoTek, Inc.Flower Mound, TXD4.5
Cardinal Health - KPR-US, LLCChicopee, MAD4.4
Avalign ThortexPortland, ORD4.3
iRhythm Technologies - CypressCypress, CAD4.3
Vitrolife, Inc.Englewood, COC3.9
Racine Metal-Fab, LLCSturtevant, WIC3.9
Gentex Corporation-Western OperationsRancho Cucamonga, CAC3.8
Carlsbad LocationCarlsbad, CAC3.8
NKAIrvine, CAC3.7
Sound Technology, Inc.State College, PAC3.6
Theragenics CorporationBuford, GAC3.6
Electronic Waveform Lab, IncHuntington Beach, CAC3.5
MainBryan, OHC3.3
Blatek, Inc.State College, PAC3.3
CRM Minnetonka MNMinnetonka, MNC3.2
Bio-DetekPawtucket, RIC3.1
Molecular Imaging - Crystal Growth FacilityRockford, TNC3.0
Sumitomo (SHI) Cryogenics of America, Inc.Allentown, PAC3.0
DeVilbiss HealthcareSomerset, PAC2.9
Quality ElectrodynamicsMayfield Village, OHC2.8
Lead-Lok, Inc.Sandpoint, IDC2.8
Kpr U.S., LLCChicopee, MAC2.8
BrownsvilleBrownsvills, TXC2.7
Med X ChangeBradenton, FLC2.7
Omega Medical Imaging, LLCSanford, FLB2.6
2967-MN110Jackson, MNB2.5
Northgate Technologies, Inc. - ElginElgin, ILB2.5
TransMedicsHQAndover, MAB2.4
CN CaguasCaguas, PRB2.4
MFG One, LLCChantilly, VAB2.3
Page 1 of 6 Next →

Nationwide industries with similar injury rates or employer scale

Two PlainSafetyScore-derived peer sets for Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing: nearest NAICS cohorts by rated-subset average TCR and by OSHA-reporting employer inventory. These are cross-industry neighborhoods, not the employer list above.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the average injury rate (TCR) in Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing?

Across 242 OSHA-reporting establishments with a credible rate, Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing averages 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers per year (Total Case Rate, 2016-2024). The BLS national benchmark for this NAICS code is 3.3.

How does Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing compare with other industries nationally?

Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing ranks #522 of 540 industries with at least 100 rated employers by average TCR (highest TCR = #1, most dangerous). That places it above 96% of ranked industries by injury rate.

How many employers report in Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing?

279 establishments report to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application under this NAICS code, of which 242 have a credible enough filing history to carry a rated average TCR.

Data sourced from official public datasets, PlainSafetyScore's OSHA ITA / BLS-based industry database (2016-2024). Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore. See our methodology for details.

Working in Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing?

This sector averages 1.8 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.

Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing Safety FAQ

What is the average injury rate (TCR) in Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing?

Across 242 OSHA-reporting establishments with a credible rate, Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing averages 1.8 recordable injuries per 100 full-time workers per year (Total Case Rate, 2016-2024). The BLS national benchmark for this NAICS code is 3.3.

How does Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing compare with other industries nationally?

Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing ranks #522 of 540 industries with at least 100 rated employers by average TCR (highest TCR = #1, most dangerous). That places it above 96% of ranked industries by injury rate.

How many employers report in Diagnostic equipment, electromedical, manufacturing?

279 establishments report to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application under this NAICS code, of which 242 have a credible enough filing history to carry a rated average TCR.