Substance abuse treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals), outpatient · California

Bakersfield Columbus

Bakersfield, CA · ~21 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bakersfield Columbus runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Substance abuse treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals), outpatient workplace, earning a grade D.

Bakersfield Columbus: 6.3 TCR = 166% of Substance abuse treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals), outpatient BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bakersfield Columbus safety composite

Bakersfield Columbus scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.3 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bakersfield Columbus: 3.8 → 4.5 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 17.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Bakersfield Columbus's TCR rose 0.7 from 3.8 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2018 at 17.0 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 621420 · Bakersfield, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 166% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #71/107
  • PHOTO Adapt/Compass - Jack…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Adapt/Compass - Jackson Street locations (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bakersfield Columbus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bakersfield Columbus averages 6.3 TCR (166% of the Substance abuse treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals), outpatient BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bakersfield Columbus TCR series: 2017=3.8 · 2018=17 · 2019=0 · 2020=4.5 · BLS 3.8

Where Bakersfield Columbus falls in its industry

611 Substance abuse treatment cent establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #71 safest of 107 Substance abuse treatment cent employers in California.

Bakersfield Columbus (21 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Bakersfield Columbus
Bakersfield Columbus (21 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 61 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Bakersfield Columbus has fewer employees than the Substance abuse treatment centers and cl median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 4.5 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 17.0 0.0 2 1 0
2017 3.8 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

621420 · CA · Bakersfield

611 Substance abuse treatment centers and clinics (except hospitals), outpatient employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 818 employers in Bakersfield, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Adapt/Compass - Jackson Street locations 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Volunteer Behavioral Health Care Services-Crossville Cumberland 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 30th Street-Multiple Programs 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Community Outreach 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA Bakersfield 4,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-04 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFL1 4,113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Esparza Enterprises, Inc 3,267 FTE
NAT-TCR Cathcart Construction Company Florida LLC Main Office 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercy Health The Assumption Village 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR DUNCANVILLE 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR FRHC - Tacoma 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE M&L Metairie 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE BWS-Heeia 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Process Displays LLC - PDF 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Big Prairie 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.