Electric power distribution systems · Alabama

Baldwin Electric Membership Corp

Summerdale, AL · ~213 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Baldwin Electric Membership Corp runs at 388% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power distribution systems workplace, earning a grade F.

Baldwin Electric Membership Corp: 4.7 TCR = 388% of Electric power distribution systems BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Baldwin Electric Membership Corp safety composite

Baldwin Electric Membership Corp scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

26/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Baldwin Electric Membership Corp: 2.1 → 4.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 7.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.01× in 2018

Baldwin Electric Membership Corp's TCR rose 2.6 from 2.1 in 2016 to 4.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 7.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 1.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Summerdale, AL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.7 · 388% of ind

  • DART 4.7 DART
  • RANK #79/138
  • PHOTO Walton EMC - Watkins…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~213 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Walton EMC - Watkinsville Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Baldwin Electric Membership Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Baldwin Electric Membership Corp averages 4.7 TCR (388% of the Electric power distribution systems BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Baldwin Electric Membership Corp TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=7.2 · 2018=4.7 · BLS 1.2

Where Baldwin Electric Membership Corp falls in its industry

2,958 Electric power distribution sy establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 138 Electric power distribution sy employers in Alabama.

Baldwin Electric Membership Corp (213 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Baldwin Electric Membership Corp
Baldwin Electric Membership Corp (213 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Baldwin Electric Membership Corp has more employees than the Electric power distribution systems median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.7 4.7 9 0 0
2017 7.2 5.1 14 0 0
2016 2.1 1.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · AL · Summerdale

2,958 Electric power distribution systems employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 8 employers in Summerdale, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Walton EMC - Watkinsville Office 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR UCEMC Cookeville 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairfield Electric Cooperative, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 32 Hibbard 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Vesta Industrial Contractors 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE BIR 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mitchell-Hollingsworth Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE ACTS Retirement-Life Communities - Magnolia Trace 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baldwin County Electric Membership Corporation 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baldwin County LGA AL MedStar Operations 129 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cunningham DeLaney Construction 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR McInnis Construction, LLC 71 FTE
NAT-TCR Compassionate Care Hospice of Burlington 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Country Inn & Suites Tinley Park 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hazelton 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR IA,ROCK RAPIDS - Medical Center Campus - General Medical and Surgical Hospitals 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Watershed of the Palm Beaches 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Centers of Aurora 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kendrion (Shelby), Inc. 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Heritage Center 213 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.