Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) · Georgia

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc

Atlanta, GA · ~2,274 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) workplace, earning a grade B.

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc: 2.0 TCR = 71% of Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc safety composite

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc: 0.8 → 4.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 4.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc's TCR rose 4.0 from 0.8 in 2018 to 4.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 71% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #13/21
  • PHOTO E.E.Cruz & Co.
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 76 inj
  • SIZE ~2,274 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: E.E.Cruz & Co. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc averages 2.0 TCR (71% of the Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc TCR series: 2018=0.8 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.3 · 2024=4.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc falls in its industry

932 Railway construction (e.g., in establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 21 Railway construction (e.g., in employers in Georgia.

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc (2,274 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc
Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc (2,274 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc has more employees than the Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.3 0.9 28 1 0
2019 1.2 0.9 29 0 0
2018 0.8 0.3 18 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · GA · Atlanta

932 Railway construction (e.g., interlocker, roadbed, signal, track) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR E.E.Cruz & Co. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TORRE CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amherst Madison, Inc. - Marine Repair-Construction 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Continental Construction Company, Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Haverty Furniture Companies 2,300 FTE
STATE-SIZE UPS CORPORATE OFFICES (GACOR) 2,303 FTE
STATE-SIZE Saint Joseph's Hospital 2,241 FTE
STATE-SIZE Monster Energy Company Georgia 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Lincoln 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Memphis Recycyling 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Village of Oswego 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Avera Health Avera Sacred Heart Hospital Campus 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Richmond-General Office (Varmn) 2,274 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kenworth Chillicothe 2,273 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lawrence + Memorial Hospital 2,273 FTE
NAT-SIZE Textron Aviation - Wichita East Campus 2,275 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.