Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with piles, soil nails, tieback anchors), construction · New York

E.E.Cruz & Co.

Queens, NY · ~134 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

E.E.Cruz & Co. runs at 71% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with piles, soil nails, tieback anchors), construction workplace, earning a grade B.

E.E.Cruz & Co.: 2.0 TCR = 71% of Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with piles, soil nails, tieback anchors), construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

E.E.Cruz & Co. safety composite

E.E.Cruz & Co. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 28%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2020→2024

E.E.Cruz & Co. injury rate improved

E.E.Cruz & Co.'s TCR fell 1.3 from 2.5 in 2020 to 1.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.63× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=2.5 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237990 · Queens, NY AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 71% of ind

  • DART 1.3 DART
  • RANK #18/46
  • PHOTO Balfour Beatty Infra…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

E.E.Cruz & Co. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows E.E.Cruz & Co. averages 2.0 TCR (71% of the Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with piles, soil nails, tieback anchors), construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

E.E.Cruz & Co. TCR series: 2020=2.5 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=1.7 · 2024=1.3 · BLS 2.8

Where E.E.Cruz & Co. falls in its industry

932 Retaining walls, anchored (e.g establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 46 Retaining walls, anchored (e.g employers in New York.

E.E.Cruz & Co. (134 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate E.E.Cruz & Co.
E.E.Cruz & Co. (134 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 1.5

E.E.Cruz & Co. has more employees than the Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with pi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.3 1.3 2 0 0
2023 1.7 1.7 2 0 0
2022 3.6 1.8 4 0 0
2021 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2020 2.5 2.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237990 · NY · Queens

932 Retaining walls, anchored (e.g., with piles, soil nails, tieback anchors), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 54 employers in Queens, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TORRE CONSTRUCTION DEVELOPMENT, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amherst Madison, Inc. - Marine Repair-Construction 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Continental Construction Company, Inc. 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE ASC East Ave 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE O&R Middletown 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oakfield 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE F.X. Matt Brewing - Utica 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Skanska USA Civil Inc. 5,513 FTE
CITY-NEAR Resorts World Casino NYC 1,079 FTE
CITY-NEAR Residential Transition Support Program (RTS) 507 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardinal Health 110, LLC (dba Kinray) 481 FTE
NAT-TCR 0j66 - Hattiesburg Ms 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0f61 - Jacksonville Fire 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0f44 - San Jose Fire 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Terryberry Company LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE AbbVie Cambridge Research Center 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE 0k35 - Dallas Distribution Center 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE 143 - Richmond 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cleveland OH Trackworks 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.