Water treatment plant construction · California

Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources

San Bernardino, CA · ~35 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.6
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Water treatment plant construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources: 0.6 TCR = 20% of Water treatment plant construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources safety composite

Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2021→2023

Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources injury rate improved

Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2021 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 1.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=1.7 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · San Bernardino, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.6 · 20% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #8/201
  • PHOTO Cratus Inc Main Office
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cratus Inc Main Office (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources averages 0.6 TCR (20% of the Water treatment plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources TCR series: 2021=1.7 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources falls in its industry

1,614 Water treatment plant construc establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 201 Water treatment plant construc employers in California.

Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources (35 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources
Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources (35 employees, TCR 0.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Balfour Beatty - Sterling Natural Resources has fewer employees than the Water treatment plant construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.7 1.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · CA · San Bernardino

1,614 Water treatment plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 332 employers in San Bernardino, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cratus Inc Main Office 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR M & W DRILLING, LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Summit Construction & Development LLC 0.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECI Garden City 0.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sheriff Department 3,321 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : ONT2 2,856 FTE
CITY-NEAR Transitional Assistance Department 2,824 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon Transportation Services : ONT5 2,475 FTE
NAT-TCR Samaritan Center 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR American Banknote Company 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Caerus Operating LLC 0.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Tempe Facility 0.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Max Rieke & Brothers, Inc. 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Area Energy & Electric, Inc. Columbus 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wesley Haven Villa 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fsc2 - Forensic Science Center 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.