332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing · Arizona

Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear

Goodyear, AZ · ~229 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear: 2.0 TCR = 61% of 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear safety composite

Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 60% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.0

2018→2024

Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear injury rate improved

Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear's TCR fell 4.0 from 4.8 in 2018 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 4.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.39× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=4.8 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=2.0 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Goodyear, AZ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK P60
  • PHOTO Silgan Containers Ly…
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~229 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Silgan Containers Lyons (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Arizona employers → · Look up another →

Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear TCR series: 2018=4.8 · 2019=3.8 · 2020=2 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=1.2 · 2023=0.4 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear falls in its industry

217 332431 Aluminum cans, light g establishments

Safer than 60% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear (229 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear
Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear (229 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear has more employees than the 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2023 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2022 1.2 0.4 3 0 0
2021 1.2 0.4 3 0 0
2020 2.0 1.6 5 0 0
2019 3.8 1.9 8 0 0
2018 4.8 3.4 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · AZ · Goodyear

217 332431 Aluminum cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,594 rated employers in Arizona with headcount on file · 133 employers in Goodyear, AZ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Lyons 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Toledo Plant 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silgan Containers Savage 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ball Beverage Pkg 178 Pittston 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nammo Defense Systems, Mesa AZ 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Foodservice Arizona - 1012 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Performance Arizona - 1012 229 FTE
STATE-SIZE Goodyear DC 229 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - GYR1 3,216 FTE
CITY-NEAR AZGDR - GOODYEAR HUB 2,139 FTE
CITY-NEAR Goodyear D2C 1,898 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - GYR2 1,811 FTE
NAT-TCR Wuest Electric 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Greely CO 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carrollton Markets 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sole Supports, Inc. Lyles 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hogan Transports 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alico Inc 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hubbardton Forge LLC 229 FTE
NAT-SIZE Los Alamos Medical Center 229 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.