Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing · Minnesota

Silgan Containers Savage

Savage, MN · ~123 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Silgan Containers Savage runs at 62% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Silgan Containers Savage: 2.0 TCR = 62% of Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Silgan Containers Savage safety composite

Silgan Containers Savage scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 59% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.03 per 100 workers

Safer than 59% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2024

Silgan Containers Savage injury rate improved

Silgan Containers Savage's TCR fell 2.5 from 3.3 in 2017 to 0.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=3.3 · 2018=1.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332431 · Savage, MN AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 62% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/5
  • PHOTO Ball Beverage Pkg 17…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~123 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ball Beverage Pkg 178 Pittston (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Silgan Containers Savage in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Silgan Containers Savage averages 2.0 TCR (62% of the Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Silgan Containers Savage TCR series: 2017=3.3 · 2018=1 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=2.7 · 2022=2.4 · 2023=3.8 · 2024=0.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Silgan Containers Savage falls in its industry

217 Aerosol cans, light gauge meta establishments

Safer than 59% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 5 Aerosol cans, light gauge meta employers in Minnesota.

Silgan Containers Savage (123 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Silgan Containers Savage
Silgan Containers Savage (123 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 117 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Silgan Containers Savage has more employees than the Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufac median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2023 3.8 1.5 5 0 0
2022 2.4 0.8 3 0 0
2021 2.7 0.7 4 0 0
2020 2.3 1.6 2 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2017 3.3 2.5 2 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332431 · MN · Savage

217 Aerosol cans, light gauge metal, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 63 employers in Savage, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ball Beverage Pkg 178 Pittston 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc. - Cheraw Plant 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR DS Containers Hubbard Ave. 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ball Beverage Pkg 158 Goodyear 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lametti and Sons Inc. 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Bi Products Long Prairie 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Franklin Street Bakery 123 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eggs - Big Lake MN 123 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1833 - Savage 357 FTE
CITY-NEAR Savage - Main Store 294 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN Plant 243 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Savage 180 FTE
NAT-TCR Berlin Gardens LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 50033 - Capstone Kroger Indianapolis 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Krome Detention Center 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR JMB Construction Inc 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Joliet Township High School District 204 - Transportation Center 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE IECC - Lincoln Trail College 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haskell Corporation 123 FTE
NAT-SIZE Portland 222 123 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.