Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing · California

Baltimore Aircoil Company

Madera, CA · ~290 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Baltimore Aircoil Company runs at 63% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Baltimore Aircoil Company: 2.1 TCR = 63% of Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Baltimore Aircoil Company safety composite

Baltimore Aircoil Company scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 62% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 62% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 57% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.4

2021→2024

Baltimore Aircoil Company injury rate improved

Baltimore Aircoil Company's TCR fell 0.4 from 2.4 in 2021 to 2.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=2.4 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Madera, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.1 · 63% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #2/19
  • PHOTO Modine Manufacturing…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 27 inj
  • SIZE ~290 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Modine Manufacturing Company - Grenada OEM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Baltimore Aircoil Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Baltimore Aircoil Company averages 2.1 TCR (63% of the Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Baltimore Aircoil Company TCR series: 2021=2.4 · 2022=1.8 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=2 · BLS 3.3

Where Baltimore Aircoil Company falls in its industry

461 Air-conditioning and warm air establishments

Safer than 62% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 19 Air-conditioning and warm air employers in California.

Baltimore Aircoil Company (290 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Baltimore Aircoil Company
Baltimore Aircoil Company (290 employees, TCR 2.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Baltimore Aircoil Company has more employees than the Air-conditioning and warm air heating co median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.0 0.8 7 0 0
2023 2.2 0.6 7 0 0
2022 1.8 1.2 6 0 0
2021 2.4 1.7 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · CA · Madera

461 Air-conditioning and warm air heating combination units manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 162 employers in Madera, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Modine Manufacturing Company - Grenada OEM 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR ZEKS Compressed Air Solutions 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : MFG-Pueblo, CO-USA 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elkay Plumbing Products - Savanna 2.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Susanville 290 FTE
STATE-SIZE BCCI Construction, LLC 290 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayside Interiors Inc. 290 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lancaster Burns Construction, Inc 290 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pacific Farm Management Inc 17,529 FTE
CITY-NEAR Petroff Ag Services Inc 2,253 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 170 1,485 FTE
CITY-NEAR County of Madera 1,393 FTE
NAT-TCR Compassus - Savannah 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Dickson Process Systems, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Seneca Mechanical, LLC 2.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Nanticoke Health Services 2.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Skeeter Products, Inc. 290 FTE
NAT-SIZE Boca Raton 290 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DBK1 290 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - DPP7 290 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.