Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing · Maryland

Baltimore Biopark

Baltimore, MD · ~309 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Baltimore Biopark runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Baltimore Biopark: 0.8 TCR = 24% of Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Baltimore Biopark safety composite

Baltimore Biopark scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Baltimore Biopark held a steady TCR band

Baltimore Biopark's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.2 in 2020 to 0.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 2.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.2 · 2021=2.0 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325412 · Baltimore, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #3/12
  • PHOTO TriRx Huntsville Pha…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~309 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TriRx Huntsville Pharmaceutical Services, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Baltimore Biopark in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Baltimore Biopark averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Baltimore Biopark TCR series: 2020=0.2 · 2021=2 · 2022=0.3 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=0.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Baltimore Biopark falls in its industry

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e establishments

Safer than 76% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 12 Pharmaceutical preparations (e employers in Maryland.

Baltimore Biopark (309 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Baltimore Biopark
Baltimore Biopark (309 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 171 employees and a TCR of 1.6

Baltimore Biopark has more employees than the Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 1 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 2 0 0
2022 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2021 2.0 1.4 7 0 0
2020 0.2 0.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325412 · MD · Baltimore

855 Pharmaceutical preparations (e.g., capsules, liniments, ointments, tablets) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 1,031 employers in Baltimore, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TriRx Huntsville Pharmaceutical Services, LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Creekstone Durham 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR AnazaoHealth Corporation - Las Vegas 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Aquestive- Warren 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lifetouch National School Studios - Baltimore OO4 309 FTE
STATE-SIZE 97390003-680000 DEPT. OF PERMITTING, INSP ENFORCEMENT 309 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1142 - Towson 310 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2931 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR Johns Hopkins Hospital 12,523 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Medical Center 7,980 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sinai Hospital of Baltimore 7,770 FTE
CITY-NEAR NGMS-T340 6,180 FTE
NAT-TCR Carolina Precision Components, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Louisiana-Pacific Carthage 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Distribution Center - MMDC 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Rausch Coleman Development Group Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE WithersRavenel 309 FTE
NAT-SIZE North Dallas TX FXFE-NDA 309 FTE
NAT-SIZE MasterBrand Cabinets, Inc. Field Sales 309 FTE
NAT-SIZE 200 Dunham Avenue 309 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.