Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing · Kentucky

Bando USA Bowling Green

Bowling Green, KY · ~145 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bando USA Bowling Green runs at 285% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Bando USA Bowling Green: 9.4 TCR = 285% of Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bando USA Bowling Green safety composite

Bando USA Bowling Green scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2022→2024

Bando USA Bowling Green injury rate improved

Bando USA Bowling Green's TCR fell 2.2 from 10.2 in 2022 to 8.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 10.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=10.2 · 2023=10.0 · 2024=8.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326220 · Bowling Green, KY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 285% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Beltservice - Hunter…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 41 inj
  • SIZE ~145 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beltservice - Huntersville (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Bando USA Bowling Green in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bando USA Bowling Green averages 9.4 TCR (285% of the Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bando USA Bowling Green TCR series: 2022=10.2 · 2023=10 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Bando USA Bowling Green falls in its industry

160 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyo establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyo employers in Kentucky.

Bando USA Bowling Green (145 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bando USA Bowling Green
Bando USA Bowling Green (145 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Bando USA Bowling Green has more employees than the Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevato median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 4.8 10 0 0
2023 10.0 5.0 15 1 0
2022 10.2 1.9 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326220 · KY · Bowling Green

160 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 331 employers in Bowling Green, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beltservice - Huntersville 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Masterduct, Inc. 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRP Jones, LLC 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Habasit Globe Inc 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Piramal Pharma Solutions 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Real Alloy Morgantown 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE Real Alloy Recycling, LLC 145 FTE
STATE-SIZE MISA Metal Fabricating, Inc. 145 FTE
CITY-NEAR Western Kentucky University-Bowling Green 2,237 FTE
CITY-NEAR The Medical Center at Bowling Green 1,872 FTE
CITY-NEAR Magna Bowling Green Metalforming 1,441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bowling Green Metalforming 1,344 FTE
NAT-TCR Woodhaven Furniture Industries - Coolidge 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR NationsBenefits LLC - NationsMarket Hollywood FL 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Casting Solutions, LLC 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Store 1790 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Stair Corporation 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE PMR Plant Martin 145 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Connecticut - Waterbury Campus 145 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.