Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing · North Carolina

Beltservice - Huntersville

Huntersville, NC · ~32 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Beltservice - Huntersville runs at 286% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Beltservice - Huntersville: 9.4 TCR = 286% of Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Beltservice - Huntersville safety composite

Beltservice - Huntersville scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−18.2

2017→2023

Beltservice - Huntersville injury rate improved

Beltservice - Huntersville's TCR fell 18.2 from 20.7 in 2017 to 2.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2017 at 20.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.26× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=20.7 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326220 · Huntersville, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.4 · 286% of ind

  • DART 2.5 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO Bando USA Bowling Gr…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Bando USA Bowling Green (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Beltservice - Huntersville in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Beltservice - Huntersville averages 9.4 TCR (286% of the Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Beltservice - Huntersville TCR series: 2017=20.7 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=2.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Beltservice - Huntersville falls in its industry

160 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyo establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyo employers in North Carolina.

Beltservice - Huntersville (32 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Beltservice - Huntersville
Beltservice - Huntersville (32 employees, TCR 9.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 132 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Beltservice - Huntersville has fewer employees than the Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevato median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 5.1 2.6 2 0 0
2017 20.7 10.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326220 · NC · Huntersville

160 Belting, rubber (e.g., conveyor, elevator, transmission), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 117 employers in Huntersville, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Bando USA Bowling Green 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Masterduct, Inc. 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR NRP Jones, LLC 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Habasit Globe Inc 9.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE T.C. Smith Produce Farm 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE LATHAMS NURSERY INC. - MONROE, NC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lake Wendell Farming Co. LLC 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Case Farms Goldsboro Hatchery 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR McGuire Nuclear 1,045 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Huntersville Medical Center 1,002 FTE
CITY-NEAR Huntersville Field Support Center 929 FTE
CITY-NEAR Metrolina Greenhouses - Huntersville NC 725 FTE
NAT-TCR Midwest Medical Transport Company - Columbus Ohio Station 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR RK-033-Kendalville ( RK-033 ) 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Homewood Suites Beaverton 9.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4608 Waco, TX 9.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Southern Rebar & Supplies Inc. - Albany, GA. 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Columbia College Fac 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5 Generation Bakers - Bakery 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zarsky Lumber Co - Corpus Christi 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.