Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Oregon

Bandon Senior Living

Bandon, OR · ~69 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bandon Senior Living runs at 309% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bandon Senior Living: 11.7 TCR = 309% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bandon Senior Living safety composite

Bandon Senior Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bandon Senior Living: 5.5 → 6.4 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 37.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.55× in 2024

Bandon Senior Living's TCR rose 0.9 from 5.5 in 2016 to 6.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 37.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.55× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Bandon, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.7 · 309% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #137/218
  • PHOTO Aegis Living Mercer …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Aegis Living Mercer Island (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

Bandon Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bandon Senior Living averages 11.7 TCR (309% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bandon Senior Living TCR series: 2016=5.5 · 2017=20.5 · 2018=17.3 · 2019=2.1 · 2021=37.8 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Bandon Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #137 safest of 218 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

Bandon Senior Living (69 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bandon Senior Living
Bandon Senior Living (69 employees, TCR 11.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Bandon Senior Living has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.4 6.4 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 4.2 4.2 2 0 0
2021 37.8 37.8 9 8 0
2019 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2018 17.3 17.3 8 0 0
2017 20.5 20.5 9 0 0
2016 5.5 3.7 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OR · Bandon

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 9 employers in Bandon, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Aegis Living Mercer Island 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meadowlark Senior Living 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merrill Gardens at Siena Hills 11.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AlmaVia of San Rafael 11.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE City of Bend - Utilities Dept Boyd Campus 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE 601 Suburban Door Tualatin 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE ATI Cast Products Salem Operations 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cummins Battery Systems North America LLC 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bandon Dunes LP 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern Coos Hospital and Health Center 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR Southern Coos Hospital & Health Center 158 FTE
CITY-NEAR Coos County School District NO 54 144 FTE
NAT-TCR Store #12 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Electric Division 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Whitesides Dairy 11.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0559 Staten Island 11.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nanophase Romeoville site 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Comfort Systems USA Ohio Cleveland 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversicare of Pell City 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store #54 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.