Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation · California

Barnett Refrigeration, Inc.

Clovis, CA · ~28 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Barnett Refrigeration, Inc. runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation workplace, earning a grade C.

Barnett Refrigeration, Inc.: 3.2 TCR = 114% of Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Barnett Refrigeration, Inc. safety composite

Barnett Refrigeration, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 52% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Barnett Refrigeration, Inc. held a steady TCR band

Barnett Refrigeration, Inc.'s TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Clovis, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 114% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #250/594
  • PHOTO HMC Service Company
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HMC Service Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Barnett Refrigeration, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Barnett Refrigeration, Inc. averages 3.2 TCR (114% of the Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Barnett Refrigeration, Inc. TCR series: 2017=0 · 2019=4.2 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Barnett Refrigeration, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 Refrigeration system (e.g., co establishments

Safer than 52% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #250 safest of 594 Refrigeration system (e.g., co employers in California.

Barnett Refrigeration, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Barnett Refrigeration, Inc.
Barnett Refrigeration, Inc. (28 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Barnett Refrigeration, Inc. has fewer employees than the Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 8.5 4.3 2 0 0
2019 4.2 4.2 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · CA · Clovis

5,793 Refrigeration system (e.g., commercial, industrial, scientific) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 125 employers in Clovis, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HMC Service Company 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Proteus, Inc. Dinuba Service Center 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR James River Air Conditioning 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Critchfield Mechanical Inc. 3.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Davis Ranch L.L.C. 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Steinbeck Country Produce 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE Harlan Family Ranch 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE KKG Equipment Company, LLC32 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clovis Community Medical Ctr 2,643 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alorica - Clovis 687 FTE
CITY-NEAR City of Clovis 668 FTE
CITY-NEAR Enhanced Landscape Management 510 FTE
NAT-TCR Franklin Iron and Metal Corp 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR YK-YK-YORK 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwest Specialty Coatings Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Evergreen Senior Living Chillicothe #160 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valentine Commons 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Vista Del Rio 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Virginian, The 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tremont, The 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.