Poultry feeds, supplements, and concentrates manufacturing · Wisconsin

Barron Feed Mill

Barron, WI · ~35 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Barron Feed Mill runs at 79% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Poultry feeds, supplements, and concentrates manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Barron Feed Mill: 3.1 TCR = 79% of Poultry feeds, supplements, and concentrates manufacturing BLS 3.9 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Barron Feed Mill safety composite

Barron Feed Mill scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 76% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Barron Feed Mill held a steady TCR band

Barron Feed Mill's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 9.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.0 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311119 · Barron, WI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 3.1 · 79% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #24/53
  • PHOTO M-G Inc. Feed Division
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: M-G Inc. Feed Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Barron Feed Mill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Barron Feed Mill averages 3.1 TCR (79% of the Poultry feeds, supplements, and concentrates manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Barron Feed Mill TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=2.8 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.9 · 2021=6.5 · 2022=9.4 · 2023=3.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.9

Where Barron Feed Mill falls in its industry

756 Poultry feeds, supplements, an establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 53 Poultry feeds, supplements, an employers in Wisconsin.

Barron Feed Mill (35 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Barron Feed Mill
Barron Feed Mill (35 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 36 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Barron Feed Mill has fewer employees than the Poultry feeds, supplements, and concentr median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 3.1 3.1 1 0 0
2022 9.4 3.1 3 0 0
2021 6.5 6.5 2 0 0
2020 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2017 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311119 · WI · Barron

756 Poultry feeds, supplements, and concentrates manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 18 employers in Barron, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR M-G Inc. Feed Division 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Case Farms LLC FeedMill 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Case Farms Calypso Feed Mill 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR TFC LaVergne Feed Mill 3.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience JVL1-JanesvilleWI 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eau Claire Energy Cooperative 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE C00280-Josheph Campbell CO Milwaukee WI 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rite Hite 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barron Plant 1,060 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Health System-Northland (Barron) 321 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barron Grow Out 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR Barron Breeder Farms 120 FTE
NAT-TCR Rev-A-Shelf, LLC 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR New Miami 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Lafayette Worwag 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Diamond Plastics Corporation Lubbock 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Turman Lumber Company Salem 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE BTrenchless/HDD Willco 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baylor Scott & White Emergency Hospital Mansfield 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stricks Ag LLC 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.