Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing · Wisconsin

Manion Truss & Components

Superior, WI · ~35 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manion Truss & Components runs at 506% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Manion Truss & Components: 16.7 TCR = 506% of Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manion Truss & Components safety composite

Manion Truss & Components scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.71 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Manion Truss & Components: 7.5 → 16.7 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 28.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.5× in 2024

Manion Truss & Components's TCR rose 9.2 from 7.5 in 2018 to 16.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 28.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.5× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 321214 · Superior, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.7 · 506% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Tex Truss Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Tex Truss Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Manion Truss & Components in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manion Truss & Components averages 16.7 TCR (506% of the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manion Truss & Components TCR series: 2018=7.5 · 2019=25.6 · 2020=15.5 · 2021=7 · 2022=28 · 2024=16.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Manion Truss & Components falls in its industry

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Trusses, wood roof or floor, m employers in Wisconsin.

Manion Truss & Components (35 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Manion Truss & Components
Manion Truss & Components (35 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 7.0

Manion Truss & Components has fewer employees than the Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.7 8.3 6 0 0
2022 28.0 7.0 8 0 0
2021 7.0 7.0 2 0 0
2020 15.5 7.7 4 0 0
2019 25.6 14.7 7 0 0
2018 7.5 3.7 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

321214 · WI · Superior

421 Trusses, wood roof or floor, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 80 employers in Superior, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Tex Truss Inc. 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR TrussTheForce 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wisconsin Bldg - Green Bay Truss 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Desert Truss 16.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Corteva Agriscience JVL1-JanesvilleWI 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eau Claire Energy Cooperative 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE C00280-Josheph Campbell CO Milwaukee WI 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rite Hite 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR School District of Superior 1,033 FTE
CITY-NEAR Halvor Lines, Inc. Superior 747 FTE
CITY-NEAR Halvor Lines Superior Terminal 527 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakehead Constructors, Inc. 474 FTE
NAT-TCR 2161 Ctv8 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR BSL Smithtown Operations Inc 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Advanced Diversified Services Inc 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Meaub - Auburn 16.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Abatement Company, LLC 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farmington Displays Inc 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE D48 Shreveport 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE 299 - Baton Rouge 2 La 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.