Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Maryland

Bartholomew House Assisted Living

Bethesda, MD · ~31 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bartholomew House Assisted Living runs at 347% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Bartholomew House Assisted Living: 13.2 TCR = 347% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bartholomew House Assisted Living safety composite

Bartholomew House Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 4%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.24 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bartholomew House Assisted Living: 5.1 → 21.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 21.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.61× in 2023

Bartholomew House Assisted Living's TCR rose 16.1 from 5.1 in 2022 to 21.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.61× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Bethesda, MD ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 13.2 · 347% of ind

  • DART 21.2 DART
  • RANK #76/87
  • PHOTO Copeland Oaks
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Copeland Oaks (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Bartholomew House Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bartholomew House Assisted Living averages 13.2 TCR (347% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bartholomew House Assisted Living TCR series: 2022=5.1 · 2023=21.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Bartholomew House Assisted Living falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 87 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Maryland.

Bartholomew House Assisted Living (31 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Bartholomew House Assisted Living
Bartholomew House Assisted Living (31 employees, TCR 13.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Bartholomew House Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 21.2 21.2 5 0 0
2022 5.1 5.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MD · Bethesda

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 107 employers in Bethesda, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Copeland Oaks 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Carriage House 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Progressive Care Pelican Landing 13.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Malta House 13.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Eichberg Construction, Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manekin Construction, LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE J C PORTER CONSTRUCTION 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE S.A. Comunale - District of Columbia 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Coats, Inc. 6,040 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vador Ventures Inc 5,569 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark (Clark Construction, Clark Concrete,Clark Civil, Clark Foundations) 2,961 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clark Construction Group LLC 2,313 FTE
NAT-TCR Police Department 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR AWS- Contra Costa County 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HG676 13.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02027 13.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Barfield-Brandon Enterprises, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Capital Programs & Buildings 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ron Bouchard Chrysler Dodge Ram, LLC 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Construction Division 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.