Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) · Kansas

Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette

Sublette, KS · ~42 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
19.3
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette runs at 428% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) workplace, earning a grade F.

Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette: 19.3 TCR = 428% of Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS 4.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette safety composite

Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 52% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

13/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 19.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 21.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette: 10.0 → 28.5 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 28.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.11× in 2017

Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette's TCR rose 18.5 from 10.0 in 2016 to 28.5 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 1.11× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 112112 · Sublette, KS ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 19.3 · 428% of ind

  • DART 21.4 DART
  • RANK #50/50
  • PHOTO Quality Beef Producers
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Quality Beef Producers (1.3 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kansas employers → · Look up another →

Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette averages 19.3 TCR (428% of the Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette TCR series: 2016=10 · 2017=28.5 · BLS 4.5

Where Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette falls in its industry

165 Cattle feedlots (except stocky establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kansas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #50 safest of 50 Cattle feedlots (except stocky employers in Kansas.

Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette (42 employees, TCR 19.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 020406080100 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette
Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette (42 employees, TCR 19.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Bartlett Cattle Company, L.P. - Sublette has fewer employees than the Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 28.5 21.4 12 0 0
2016 10.0 8.0 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

112112 · KS · Sublette

165 Cattle feedlots (except stockyards for transportation) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 5,228 rated employers in Kansas with headcount on file · 8 employers in Sublette, KS · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Quality Beef Producers 20.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR BVFDR-BVFDR-BOISE VALLEY FEEDERS 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Simplot Feeders Pasco Feedlot - Burbank 15.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wilson Creek Cattle Feeders 15.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Sedan Floral Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rio Vista Farms LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Zoltenko Farms 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE HUTCHINSON SC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR APC - Sublette 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Friona Cattle Feeders North #1 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cobalt Cattle Company LLC - Sublette 38 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sublette Feeders, LLC 38 FTE
NAT-TCR Aroostook Band of Micmacs 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR ITC Washington 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 230409-Bal-Govans Sta 19.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 6962-SWY-0029-0029-02442 19.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Avanti Wind Systems, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE WSW 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Bethany Inc 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hilton Garden Inn 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.