HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors · Georgia

Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc.

Marietta, GA · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.5
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc. runs at 232% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors workplace, earning a grade F.

Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc.: 6.5 TCR = 232% of HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc. safety composite

Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc.: 0.0 → 13.1 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 13.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2020

Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc.'s TCR rose 13.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 13.1 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Marietta, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.5 · 232% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #101/123
  • PHOTO RRSC Minneapolis/St.…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: RRSC Minneapolis/St. Paul Market (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc. averages 6.5 TCR (232% of the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2018=6.4 · 2020=13.1 · BLS 2.8

Where Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and establishments

Safer than 24% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #101 safest of 123 HVAC (heating, ventilation and employers in Georgia.

Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc.
Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc. (20 employees, TCR 6.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Bartlett Heating & Cooling, Inc. has fewer employees than the HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-condi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 13.1 0.0 2 0 0
2018 6.4 0.0 1 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · GA · Marietta

5,793 HVAC (heating, ventilation and air-conditioning) contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 350 employers in Marietta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR RRSC Minneapolis/St. Paul Market 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR A&D Spokane 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hurlburt Heating & Plumbing 6.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Vital Mechanical Service 6.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cal-Maine foods St George 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lab 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE FUNSTON GIN 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pennington Seed - Seed Production Division (SPI) 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR MARIETTA PACKERS 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar Kennestone Hospital 5,581 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation US GA Marietta S Cobb Dr (1169) 5,310 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) 5,205 FTE
NAT-TCR New Jersey American Water-Fire Road 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Michigan Complex 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Ridge 6.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Visionary Sleep - Indiana 6.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE McConnelsville Save A Lot #45090 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shelby Save A Lot #45027 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Grape Harvesting & Farming | QC 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Healy I 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.