Employer · Georgia

Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169)

Marietta, GA · ~5,205 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) runs at 636% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical industry workplace, earning a grade F.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169): 3.2 TCR = 636% of industry BLS 0.5 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) safety composite

Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.18 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) held a steady TCR band

Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169)'s TCR held near 0.2 from 3.1 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.1 · 2017=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541512 · Marietta, GA ABOVE-IND · LARGE

Grade F · TCR 3.2 · 636% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO TRIDELTA SYSTEMS LLC
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 305 inj
  • SIZE ~5,205 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: TRIDELTA SYSTEMS LLC (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) averages 3.2 TCR (636% of the industry BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) TCR series: 2016=3.1 · 2017=3.3 · BLS 0.5

Where Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) falls in its industry

181 industry establishments

Safer than 6% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 industry employers in Georgia.

Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) (5,205 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169)
Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) (5,205 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 292 employees and a TCR of 0.3

Lockheed Martin Corporation Marietta Campus (1169) has more employees than the industry median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.3 0.9 157 20 0
2016 3.1 1.3 148 27 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541512 · GA · Marietta

181 industry employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 350 employers in Marietta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR TRIDELTA SYSTEMS LLC 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Synaptics Headquarters 3.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Leading Edge Manufacturing dba Joined Alloys 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ocado Solutions USA Aurora 3.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lockheed Martin Corporation US GA Marietta S Cobb Dr (1169) 5,310 FTE
STATE-SIZE Northeast Georgia Medical Center, Inc. 5,384 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hyundai MOBIS, LLC - Georgia Plant 5,436 FTE
STATE-SIZE Emory University Hospital - EHC 4,931 FTE
CITY-NEAR MARIETTA PACKERS 9,165 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar Kennestone Hospital 5,581 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar Medical Group 3,289 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellStar Health System 2,649 FTE
NAT-TCR Allstate Power Vac Inc. Maintenance/Washbay/Trans 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Moreno Valley - Aldi 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0017 1202 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Le Peep 2 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hospital for Special Surgery 5,195 FTE
NAT-SIZE University Health System, Inc 5,215 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orlando Regional Medical Center 5,195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tul-Tulsa-Maintenance Base 5,184 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.