Distribution of electric power · Missouri

Barton County Electric Cooperative

Lamar, MO · ~28 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Barton County Electric Cooperative runs at 507% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Distribution of electric power workplace, earning a grade F.

Barton County Electric Cooperative: 6.1 TCR = 507% of Distribution of electric power BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Barton County Electric Cooperative safety composite

Barton County Electric Cooperative scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.2

2016→2024

Barton County Electric Cooperative injury rate improved

Barton County Electric Cooperative's TCR fell 10.2 from 14.4 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 14.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=14.4 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Lamar, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.1 · 507% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #108/127
  • PHOTO Blue Ridge Mountain …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blue Ridge Mountain Electric Membership (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Barton County Electric Cooperative in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Barton County Electric Cooperative averages 6.1 TCR (507% of the Distribution of electric power BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Barton County Electric Cooperative TCR series: 2016=14.4 · 2018=7.1 · 2019=7.4 · 2020=7.7 · 2021=0 · 2022=7.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 1.2

Where Barton County Electric Cooperative falls in its industry

2,958 Distribution of electric power establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #108 safest of 127 Distribution of electric power employers in Missouri.

Barton County Electric Cooperative (28 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Barton County Electric Cooperative
Barton County Electric Cooperative (28 employees, TCR 6.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Barton County Electric Cooperative has fewer employees than the Distribution of electric power median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 7.9 0.0 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 7.7 7.7 2 0 0
2019 7.4 0.0 1 1 0
2018 7.1 3.6 2 0 0
2016 14.4 3.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · MO · Lamar

2,958 Distribution of electric power employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 15 employers in Lamar, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blue Ridge Mountain Electric Membership 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri-County Electric- Portland 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR LADWP 2333 RIPPLE 6.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 07 Little Falls 6.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Southern Hills 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOPV-SEL-PRAIRIE VIEW - LAYING HEN' 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE State Line Combined Cycle 28 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Substations - South 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 338 182 FTE
CITY-NEAR 338 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Redneck Outdoor Products 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Envision Outdoor Living - Lamar 71 FTE
NAT-TCR Lake Court Roseville 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Estates at Rush City 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Progress Truss LLC 6.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Southwick Wild Animal Farm Inc 6.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rome Enterprises II Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gilded Mirrors Inc. 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE Houston Armature Works Inc 28 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Welding & Fabrication Inc 28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.