Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Illinois

Barton Senior Residences of Chicago

Chicago, IL · ~61 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Barton Senior Residences of Chicago runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Barton Senior Residences of Chicago: 2.0 TCR = 53% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Barton Senior Residences of Chicago safety composite

Barton Senior Residences of Chicago scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Barton Senior Residences of Chicago held a steady TCR band

Barton Senior Residences of Chicago's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=3.0 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Chicago, IL AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 53% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #22/217
  • PHOTO Windsorwood Place
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Windsorwood Place (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Barton Senior Residences of Chicago in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Barton Senior Residences of Chicago averages 2.0 TCR (53% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Barton Senior Residences of Chicago TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=3 · 2020=6.5 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Barton Senior Residences of Chicago falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #22 safest of 217 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Illinois.

Barton Senior Residences of Chicago (61 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Barton Senior Residences of Chicago
Barton Senior Residences of Chicago (61 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Barton Senior Residences of Chicago has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2020 6.5 4.3 3 0 0
2019 3.0 3.0 2 0 0
2018 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · IL · Chicago

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 2,934 employers in Chicago, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Windsorwood Place 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CELEBRATION VILLA OF ALLISON PARK 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR FM Gilman, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Auberge of Plano 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Goodmark Nurseries LLC 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2505-Mason City, IL (Monsanto Co.) 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Springfield 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN ILLINOIS - Gas Tech - Engineering 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago Public Schools 49,500 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chicago/Corporate 18,831 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Illinois at Chicago 13,092 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health Service UIC UIC Campus 12,732 FTE
NAT-TCR Herzog Transit Services - Stockton 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR MN 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Staples 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Escondido Disposal Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wolverine Service Center 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rouses Market #24 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE CFLL 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1137 Nampa 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.