Local passenger rail systems (except mixed mode) · California

Herzog Transit Services - Stockton

Stockton, CA · ~53 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Herzog Transit Services - Stockton runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Local passenger rail systems (except mixed mode) workplace, earning a grade A.

Herzog Transit Services - Stockton: 2.0 TCR = 44% of Local passenger rail systems (except mixed mode) BLS 4.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Herzog Transit Services - Stockton safety composite

Herzog Transit Services - Stockton scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Herzog Transit Services - Stockton: 2.1 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 5.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.43× in 2024

Herzog Transit Services - Stockton's TCR rose 0.8 from 2.1 in 2017 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 485112 · Stockton, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 44% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #4/18
  • PHOTO ACI-Herzog, Joint Ve…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~53 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ACI-Herzog, Joint Venture (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Herzog Transit Services - Stockton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Herzog Transit Services - Stockton averages 2.0 TCR (44% of the Local passenger rail systems (except mixed mode) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Herzog Transit Services - Stockton TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=0 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=0.2 · 2022=5.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 4.5

Where Herzog Transit Services - Stockton falls in its industry

71 Local passenger rail systems ( establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 18 Local passenger rail systems ( employers in California.

Herzog Transit Services - Stockton (53 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 3.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Herzog Transit Services - Stockton
Herzog Transit Services - Stockton (53 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 83 employees and a TCR of 3.1

Herzog Transit Services - Stockton has fewer employees than the Local passenger rail systems (except mix median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.4 3.6 3 0 0
2021 0.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.8 1.8 1 0 0
2019 3.6 1.8 2 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 2.1 2.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

485112 · CA · Stockton

71 Local passenger rail systems (except mixed mode) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 605 employers in Stockton, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ACI-Herzog, Joint Venture 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bombardier Transportation - Orlando - SUNRAIL 2.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 55837 IMPERIAL 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bombardier Transportation - Camden - RiverLine 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE P-R Farms 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE LRC LABOR SERVICES INC 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Acemi Nursery 53 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ball Tagawa Growers 53 FTE
CITY-NEAR LaSalette Care and Rehabilitation Center 5,249 FTE
CITY-NEAR SCKCX0ABX SCK - ABX 4,573 FTE
CITY-NEAR CA-18 4,525 FTE
CITY-NEAR CDCR CA Health Care Facility 3,227 FTE
NAT-TCR Barton Senior Residences of Chicago 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR IL - Allied 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Staples 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR S04137 - Augusta Hauling 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Donco 3 Construction 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Natural Beauty Growers, LLC - Boyden IA 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE Miami 17th Avenue Yard 401 53 FTE
NAT-SIZE M&K, Inc. dba McCauley Services 53 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.