Engineering research and development laboratories or services · Texas

Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO

Webster, TX · ~20 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Engineering research and development laboratories or services workplace, earning a grade C.

Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS 0.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO safety composite

Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO held a steady TCR band

Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 0.0 TCR.

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 541712 · Webster, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/14
  • PHOTO Syngenta Greensboro
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Syngenta Greensboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Engineering research and development laboratories or services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO falls in its industry

319 Engineering research and devel establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 14 Engineering research and devel employers in Texas.

Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO (20 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO
Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO (20 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 159 employees and a TCR of 0.8

Bastion Technologies, Inc.-CARGO has fewer employees than the Engineering research and development lab median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

541712 · TX · Webster

319 Engineering research and development laboratories or services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 85 employers in Webster, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Syngenta Greensboro 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ExxonMobil Chemical Company Baytown Technology & Engineering Complex 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Waymo HQ 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chamblee Campus 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Black Gold Farms TXP 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE CANNONADE SOD FARM 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Farmers Cooperative Society #1 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Slaton Coop Gin 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA HOUSTON HEALTHCARE CLEAR LAKE 2,027 FTE
CITY-NEAR Clear Lake Regional Medical Center 1,918 FTE
CITY-NEAR abctree 1,449 FTE
CITY-NEAR ABC Professional Tree Services, Inc 1,333 FTE
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Fremont - Community Support Includes Recreation and Human Services 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE WES Construction 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE AHF Products 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Team Print Media LLC 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE Park Maintenance 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.