Administration of Conservation Programs · Minnesota

Park Maintenance

Winona, MN · ~20 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.6
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Park Maintenance runs at 299% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Administration of Conservation Programs workplace, earning a grade F.

Park Maintenance: 9.6 TCR = 299% of Administration of Conservation Programs BLS 3.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Park Maintenance safety composite

Park Maintenance scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.56 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Park Maintenance: 0.0 → 15.7 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 17.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Park Maintenance's TCR rose 15.7 from 0.0 in 2019 to 15.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 17.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 924120 · Winona, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.6 · 299% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #40/45
  • PHOTO Huntley Park District
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~20 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Huntley Park District (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Park Maintenance in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Park Maintenance averages 9.6 TCR (299% of the Administration of Conservation Programs BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Park Maintenance TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=17.3 · 2021=8 · 2022=16.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=15.7 · BLS 3.2

Where Park Maintenance falls in its industry

413 Administration of Conservation establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 45 Administration of Conservation employers in Minnesota.

Park Maintenance (20 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Park Maintenance
Park Maintenance (20 employees, TCR 9.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 69 employees and a TCR of 5.0

Park Maintenance has fewer employees than the Administration of Conservation Programs median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.7 0.0 1 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 16.4 8.2 2 0 0
2021 8.0 8.0 1 0 0
2020 17.3 8.7 1 1 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

924120 · MN · Winona

413 Administration of Conservation Programs employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 149 employers in Winona, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Huntley Park District 9.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington State Dept of Natural Resources - Olympic Region 9.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Parks & Recreation Operations 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hoffman Estates Park District 9.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE C74 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE MNSGA-SEL-SELECT GENETICS ADMIN' 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bees Minnesota 20 FTE
STATE-SIZE Glyndon 20 FTE
CITY-NEAR Minnesota State Winona State University 1,635 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winona Health Services 935 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winona State University 734 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Mary's University of Minnesota - Winona 731 FTE
NAT-TCR Diaco Food Service 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Merit Mechanical, Inc. 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lifestyle Support Services, Inc. 9.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Class Leasing,LLC 9.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Team Print Media LLC 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCown Crafted Inc. 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE WES Construction 20 FTE
NAT-SIZE AHF Products 20 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.