Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

Bay Park

Name: Bay Park Workplace Safety Data
Creator: PlainSafetyScore
License: https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Pinole, CA · ~28 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

Compiled by PlainSafetyScore · August 25, 2026

B
Good Safety Record: 2.6
Avg TCR: 3.8
Industry avg: 0
Fatalities

Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bay Park runs at 70% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

Bay Park: 2.6 TCR = 70% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bay Park safety composite

Bay Park scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR): B 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers
DART rate: B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers
Fatalities: D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Bay Park held a steady TCR band

Bay Park's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2019 at 15.9 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=15.9 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Pinole, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 70% of ind

DART 0.0 DART
RANK #38/635
PHOTO Frontida Management …
BOOK 6y book
INJ 3 inj
SIZE ~28 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Frontida Management Group LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

This site

2.6
Frontida Manag

2.6
Integrity Esth

2.6
Kinder Care, I

2.6
Brookdale Seni

2.6

What this shows Bay Park averages 2.6 TCR (70% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Bay Park TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=15.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · BLS 3.8

Where Bay Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

Grade B

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #38 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

Bay Park (28 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Bay Park has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year	TCR	DART	Injuries
2022	0.0	0.0	0
2021	0.0	0.0	0
2020	0.0	0.0	0
2019	15.9	15.9	3
2018	0.0	0.0	0
2017	0.0	0.0	0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Pinole

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 17 employers in Pinole, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel	Establishment	Place	Metric
NAICS-TCR	Frontida Management Group LLC	KENOSHA, WI	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Integrity Esthers Place LLC/Main The Park	BALTIMORE, MD	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Kinder Care, Inc.	WEST FARGO, ND	2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR	Brookdale Senior Living	ROCKY MT, NC	2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE	Davis Ranch L.L.C.	SLOUGHHOUSE	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Steinbeck Country Produce	SALINAS	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	Harlan Family Ranch	WOODLAND	28 FTE
STATE-SIZE	KKG Equipment Company, LLC32	RUTHERFORD	28 FTE
CITY-NEAR	0737 - Pinole	Pinole	225 FTE
CITY-NEAR	Trader Joe's 0230 Pinole	Pinole	99 FTE
CITY-NEAR	021 - Pinole Ca	Pinole	99 FTE
CITY-NEAR	021 Pinole Ca	Pinole	98 FTE
NAT-TCR	Redstone Highlands-Murrysville	Murrysville, PA	2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Rupp Air Management Systems	Raleigh, NC	2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Redmond Grocery Outlet	Redmond, OR	2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR	Schimenti Construction Company LLC	Ridgefield, CT	2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE	Iris Place	Athens, GA	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	6795-03313B01	West St. Paul, MN	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Tri-State Power Plant Craig CO - BSL	Craig, CO	28 FTE
NAT-SIZE	Birkey'S Farm Store, Inc. - Galesburg	Galesburg, IL	28 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.