Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · North Carolina

Rupp Air Management Systems

Raleigh, NC · ~130 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rupp Air Management Systems runs at 80% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Rupp Air Management Systems: 2.6 TCR = 80% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rupp Air Management Systems safety composite

Rupp Air Management Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rupp Air Management Systems held a steady TCR band

Rupp Air Management Systems's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.4 in 2017 to 4.5 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=4.4 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=4.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Raleigh, NC AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 2.6 · 80% of ind

  • DART 0.7 DART
  • RANK #12/37
  • PHOTO Humanetcis - McAllen
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~130 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Humanetcis - McAllen (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Rupp Air Management Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rupp Air Management Systems averages 2.6 TCR (80% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rupp Air Management Systems TCR series: 2017=4.4 · 2018=2.1 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=0.9 · 2021=3.2 · 2022=4.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Rupp Air Management Systems falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 75% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 37 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in North Carolina.

Rupp Air Management Systems (130 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Rupp Air Management Systems
Rupp Air Management Systems (130 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Rupp Air Management Systems has more employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.5 0.7 7 0 0
2021 3.2 1.6 4 0 0
2020 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2019 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2018 2.1 0.0 3 0 0
2017 4.4 1.4 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · NC · Raleigh

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 973 employers in Raleigh, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Humanetcis - McAllen 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tenere Metals Division 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Giffin Inc 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR IVI South, Inc. 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Starr Electric Company, Inc Raleigh 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bonitz Flooring and Contracting Charlotte 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Industries, LP Oral Finished Products 130 FTE
STATE-SIZE SC Johnson Professional - Corporate office and sales 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR Headway Workforce Solutions 13,936 FTE
CITY-NEAR NC State University 11,491 FTE
CITY-NEAR UNC Rex Healthcare 7,282 FTE
CITY-NEAR SECU 6,283 FTE
NAT-TCR Redstone Highlands-Murrysville 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Redmond Grocery Outlet 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lift-All Company Landisville 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR cemtec 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mid South Transport Inc 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heartland PCA - Hibbing 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Byers D.C. Detroit Inc 130 FTE
NAT-SIZE Monofrax 130 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.