Nursing homes · Florida

Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Lake City, FL · ~88 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center runs at 143% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade D.

Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center: 9.3 TCR = 143% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

29/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.28 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center: 5.7 → 12.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 12.3 TCR · DART/TCR 1.32× in 2021

Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 6.6 from 5.7 in 2016 to 12.3 in 2021. In 2021, DART was 1.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Lake City, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 9.3 · 143% of ind

  • DART 12.3 DART
  • RANK #678/809
  • PHOTO Cleveland Health Car…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 30 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cleveland Health Care CEnter (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center averages 9.3 TCR (143% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=5.7 · 2017=8.5 · 2018=9.8 · 2019=10.1 · 2021=12.3 · BLS 6.5

Where Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 31% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #678 safest of 809 Nursing homes employers in Florida.

Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (88 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center
Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center (88 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Baya Pointe Nursing & Rehabilitation Center has fewer employees than the Nursing homes median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 12.3 12.3 4 4 0
2019 10.1 5.0 8 0 0
2018 9.8 3.7 8 0 0
2017 8.5 4.9 6 1 0
2016 5.7 3.4 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · FL · Lake City

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 115 employers in Lake City, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cleveland Health Care CEnter 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Windsor Elk Grove Care and Rehabilitation Center 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Creek Healthcare Center 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corsica Hills Center 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE PFM Plant Fort Myers 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulfstream Service Center 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dade Broward Operations Center 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE CC Devco LLC 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Anderson Columbia Co., Inc. 1,084 FTE
CITY-NEAR HCA Florida Lake City Hospital 663 FTE
CITY-NEAR HAECO Airframe Services - Lake City 605 FTE
CITY-NEAR HAECO Americas - LCQ 562 FTE
NAT-TCR Antolin Nashville 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fountain View of Grant 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Assistance Plus 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Suddath Relocation Systems of Oregon, LLC 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Big Rapids Wood 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fenton Rigging and Contracting, Inc. 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE CDF Headquarters 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Court Post Acute of Scottsdale 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.