Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) · Florida

Summit Delivery Systems

Sarasota, FL · ~88 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
29.2
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Summit Delivery Systems runs at 649% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) workplace, earning a grade F.

Summit Delivery Systems: 29.2 TCR = 649% of Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS 4.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Summit Delivery Systems safety composite

Summit Delivery Systems scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 29.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−16.1

2021→2024

Summit Delivery Systems injury rate improved

Summit Delivery Systems's TCR fell 16.1 from 31.7 in 2021 to 15.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 44.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=31.7 · 2022=44.9 · 2023=24.7 · 2024=15.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 492210 · Sarasota, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 29.2 · 649% of ind

  • DART 13.0 DART
  • RANK #90/91
  • PHOTO Catalyst Consulting …
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 71 inj
  • SIZE ~88 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Catalyst Consulting & Logistics (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Summit Delivery Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Summit Delivery Systems averages 29.2 TCR (649% of the Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Summit Delivery Systems TCR series: 2021=31.7 · 2022=44.9 · 2023=24.7 · 2024=15.6 · BLS 4.5

Where Summit Delivery Systems falls in its industry

1,452 Delivery service (except as pa establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 11.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #90 safest of 91 Delivery service (except as pa employers in Florida.

Summit Delivery Systems (88 employees, TCR 29.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Summit Delivery Systems
Summit Delivery Systems (88 employees, TCR 29.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 89 employees and a TCR of 11.8

Summit Delivery Systems has fewer employees than the Delivery service (except as part of inte median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 11.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 15.6 13.0 10 2 0
2023 24.7 23.4 19 0 0
2022 44.9 34.5 26 0 0
2021 31.7 27.7 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

492210 · FL · Sarasota

1,452 Delivery service (except as part of intercity carrier network, U.S. Postal Service) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 504 employers in Sarasota, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Catalyst Consulting & Logistics 29.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6458-ZSRT 29.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6962-GWK 0025 3116 29.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMZL-NA : Addair Insurance Agencies, LLC 29.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE PFM Plant Fort Myers 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gulfstream Service Center 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dade Broward Operations Center 88 FTE
STATE-SIZE CC Devco LLC 88 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beneva Lakes 3,238 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blue Butterfly- Lakewood Ranch 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Connexis Physicians 2,476 FTE
CITY-NEAR Treasures Thrift Shop II 2,476 FTE
NAT-TCR Cottage Grove Commons 29.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Christa McAuliffe Elementary 29.2 TCR
NAT-TCR WellQuest Palo Alto Commons 29.2 TCR
NAT-TCR MCAP Chesterfield Township Opco, LLC d/b/a Commonwealth Senior Living at New Baltimore 29.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tj Marquart & Sons, Inc 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cargill Dry Corn Ingredients - Paris 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE nexAir McLean 88 FTE
NAT-SIZE Marcy 88 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.