Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a construction site · Wisconsin

Bayland Buildings, Inc

Oneida, WI · ~176 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bayland Buildings, Inc runs at 144% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a construction site workplace, earning a grade D.

Bayland Buildings, Inc: 4.0 TCR = 144% of Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a construction site BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bayland Buildings, Inc safety composite

Bayland Buildings, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bayland Buildings, Inc: 2.1 → 2.5 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 6.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.52× in 2024

Bayland Buildings, Inc's TCR rose 0.4 from 2.1 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 6.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.52× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238120 · Oneida, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 144% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #4/10
  • PHOTO Stehl Corporation
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 59 inj
  • SIZE ~176 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stehl Corporation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Bayland Buildings, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bayland Buildings, Inc averages 4.0 TCR (144% of the Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a construction site BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bayland Buildings, Inc TCR series: 2016=2.1 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=6.2 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=3.2 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 2.8

Where Bayland Buildings, Inc falls in its industry

705 Placing and tying reinforcing establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 10 Placing and tying reinforcing employers in Wisconsin.

Bayland Buildings, Inc (176 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Bayland Buildings, Inc
Bayland Buildings, Inc (176 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Bayland Buildings, Inc has more employees than the Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a c median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 2.1 6 0 0
2023 3.6 1.5 7 0 0
2022 3.2 1.1 6 0 0
2021 4.9 3.3 9 0 0
2019 6.2 1.2 10 0 0
2018 4.8 2.7 8 1 0
2017 4.9 2.2 9 0 0
2016 2.1 0.5 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238120 · WI · Oneida

705 Placing and tying reinforcing rod at a construction site employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 4 employers in Oneida, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stehl Corporation 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Christina Steel Inc 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR ECI Erectors, LLC 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avenue Fabricating Inc 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Progressive Converting Appleton 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE Apache Stainless Equipment Corporation 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE APPLETON EAST WI - 3111 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4223-M1400 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Highview Custom Fabricating 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Therm-Oneida #270 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Therm Oneida 31 FTE
NAT-TCR Bodensteiner Implement Company Monticello Location 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Jacobsen Homes 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR North & Clybourn #115 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Miller Milling Company - Winchester 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE COH Utilities Wastewater Reclamation Facility 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Luke's Home 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pitt Ohio - Cleveland 176 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lincoln Electric Automation Fort Loramie 176 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.