Fabricated structural metal manufacturing · Wisconsin

Highview Custom Fabricating

Oneida, WI · ~42 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Highview Custom Fabricating runs at 248% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Fabricated structural metal manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Highview Custom Fabricating: 8.2 TCR = 248% of Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Highview Custom Fabricating safety composite

Highview Custom Fabricating scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 82% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

50/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Highview Custom Fabricating: 6.5 → 8.1 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 16.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0× in 2024

Highview Custom Fabricating's TCR rose 1.6 from 6.5 in 2016 to 8.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332312 · Oneida, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 248% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/46
  • PHOTO Ennis Steel Industri…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ennis Steel Industries, Inc. - Ennis Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Highview Custom Fabricating in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Highview Custom Fabricating averages 8.2 TCR (248% of the Fabricated structural metal manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Highview Custom Fabricating TCR series: 2016=6.5 · 2017=11 · 2018=5.7 · 2019=6.3 · 2020=1.8 · 2021=5.9 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=16.1 · 2024=8.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Highview Custom Fabricating falls in its industry

1,491 Fabricated structural metal ma establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 46 Fabricated structural metal ma employers in Wisconsin.

Highview Custom Fabricating (42 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Highview Custom Fabricating
Highview Custom Fabricating (42 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Highview Custom Fabricating has fewer employees than the Fabricated structural metal manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.1 0.0 3 0 0
2023 16.1 0.0 7 0 0
2022 12.2 0.0 5 0 0
2021 5.9 0.0 3 0 0
2020 1.8 0.0 1 0 0
2019 6.3 1.6 4 0 0
2018 5.7 1.9 3 0 0
2017 11.0 1.8 3 3 0
2016 6.5 0.0 2 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332312 · WI · Oneida

1,491 Fabricated structural metal manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 4 employers in Oneida, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ennis Steel Industries, Inc. - Ennis Plant 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dave Steel Co Inc - Chesnee 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kard Welding, Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Yajima USA, Ltd 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Port Washington Generating Station 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sterling Water, Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roberts Irrigation Co 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bielinski Homes 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bayland Buildings, Inc 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Therm-Oneida #270 33 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bay Therm Oneida 31 FTE
NAT-TCR Sucursal Hato Rey 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tuftco Finishing Systems 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR H & R Agripower - Brownsville 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Brookdale St. Augustine 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Owens & Minor Houston 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Roseville 39th District Court 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE DB01 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tecta Billerica 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.