Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) · Texas

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation

Dallas, TX · ~402 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) workplace, earning a grade D.

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation: 6.6 TCR = 173% of Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation safety composite

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

18/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation: 3.7 → 8.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 8.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.97× in 2020

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation's TCR rose 4.7 from 3.7 in 2016 to 8.3 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.97× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Dallas, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 173% of ind

  • DART 6.4 DART
  • RANK #157/221
  • PHOTO Healthsouth Rehabili…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 92 inj
  • SIZE ~402 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation averages 6.6 TCR (173% of the Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=5 · 2018=7.9 · 2019=7.9 · 2020=8.3 · BLS 3.8

Where Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation falls in its industry

1,390 Rehabilitation hospitals (exce establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #157 safest of 221 Rehabilitation hospitals (exce employers in Texas.

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation (402 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation
Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation (402 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation has more employees than the Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcohol median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 8.3 6.4 16 10 1
2019 7.9 6.3 24 1 0
2018 7.9 5.4 25 0 0
2017 5.0 2.8 16 0 0
2016 3.7 1.7 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · TX · Dallas

1,390 Rehabilitation hospitals (except alcoholism, drug addiction) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitations Hospital of Cape Coral, LLC 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penn State Hershey Rehabilitation Hospital 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Rehabilitation Institute, LLC 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE AltairStrickland LLC 402 FTE
STATE-SIZE TX313 Corrigan Plywood 402 FTE
STATE-SIZE General Cable - Marshall 402 FTE
STATE-SIZE USM Store #562 (Market Street) 402 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR MIREDF-OPI-REDFORD 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 121 Taylor, Mi 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 350 Massapequa, Ny 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 048-OMA 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ameristar Services Inc. 402 FTE
NAT-SIZE Flying Food Group -SFO 402 FTE
NAT-SIZE 11100 Firestone Blvd. 402 FTE
NAT-SIZE Licking County Family YMCA 402 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.