Physical rehabilitation hospitals · Texas

Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin

Austin, TX · ~193 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin runs at 173% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Physical rehabilitation hospitals workplace, earning a grade D.

Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin: 6.6 TCR = 173% of Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin safety composite

Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 6.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.27 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin: 4.0 → 9.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 9.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.8× in 2018

Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin's TCR rose 5.9 from 4.0 in 2016 to 9.9 in 2018. In 2018, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622310 · Austin, TX ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.6 · 173% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #158/221
  • PHOTO Baylor Institute for…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin averages 6.6 TCR (173% of the Physical rehabilitation hospitals BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=5.8 · 2018=9.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin falls in its industry

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospit establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #158 safest of 221 Physical rehabilitation hospit employers in Texas.

Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin (193 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin
Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin (193 employees, TCR 6.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 160 employees and a TCR of 5.4

Healthsouth Rehabilitation Hospital of Austin has more employees than the Physical rehabilitation hospitals median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 9.9 5.3 13 2 0
2017 5.8 5.8 8 0 0
2016 4.0 4.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622310 · TX · Austin

1,390 Physical rehabilitation hospitals employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baylor Institute for Rehabilitation 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Encompass Health Rehabilitations Hospital of Cape Coral, LLC 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Penn State Hershey Rehabilitation Hospital 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR California Rehabilitation Institute, LLC 6.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE 31041 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lone Star Paving Company - Austin 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tellepsen Industrial 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Russell Marine LLC 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR SpringHill Suites Nashville MetroCenter 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Pioneer Valley - Tubes & Cores - C326 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lukjan Great Plains LLC 6.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Macy Industries Inc 6.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Greenbriar Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Market Basket #7 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plumb Pak-North 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Juan 193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.