Nursing homes · Florida

Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center

Pensacola, FL · ~189 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center runs at 41% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Nursing homes workplace, earning a grade A.

Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center: 2.7 TCR = 41% of Nursing homes BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center safety composite

Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

75/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center: 1.5 → 3.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.35× in 2021

Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center's TCR rose 2.2 from 1.5 in 2016 to 3.8 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.35× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Pensacola, FL AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.7 · 41% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #150/809
  • PHOTO HCF of Briarwood, Inc.
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 19 inj
  • SIZE ~189 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: HCF of Briarwood, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center averages 2.7 TCR (41% of the Nursing homes BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center TCR series: 2016=1.5 · 2017=1.5 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=0.8 · 2020=2.5 · 2021=3.8 · BLS 6.5

Where Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing homes establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #150 safest of 809 Nursing homes employers in Florida.

Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center (189 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center
Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center (189 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center has more employees than the Nursing homes median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.8 0.9 3 1 0
2020 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2019 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 5.9 4.5 8 0 0
2017 1.5 0.0 2 0 0
2016 1.5 1.5 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · FL · Pensacola

15,252 Nursing homes employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 448 employers in Pensacola, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR HCF of Briarwood, Inc. 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 114 FRANKLIN WOODS CENTER 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR WOB facility Managemnt LLC 2.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand River Health and Rehab 2.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Parallel 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. Headquarters 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Talquin Electric Cooperative Inc. 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Southwest Florida (Fort Myers) 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeview Center 2,820 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLPEN36 ASCENSION SACRED HEART PENSACOLA HOSP 2,641 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-FLPEN36 2,578 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pensacola Christian College, Inc. 2,259 FTE
NAT-TCR Rose SL-Avon 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Hubbell 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Custom Building Products HOUC 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Manhattan Experience Center 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE 1033 - Pocatello Id Whse 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Los Angeles, CA HVAC 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Murphy Medical Center 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Local Waste Services 189 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.