Appliances, household-type (except water heaters, heating stoves (i.e., noncooking)), gas and electric, merchant · New York

Manhattan Experience Center

New York, NY · ~42 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.7
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Manhattan Experience Center runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Appliances, household-type (except water heaters, heating stoves (i.e., noncooking)), gas and electric, merchant workplace, earning a grade D.

Manhattan Experience Center: 2.7 TCR = 121% of Appliances, household-type (except water heaters, heating stoves (i.e., noncooking)), gas and electric, merchant BLS 2.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Manhattan Experience Center safety composite

Manhattan Experience Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 24%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 24% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Manhattan Experience Center: 2.7 → 51.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 6060.6 TCR · DART/TCR 8.58× in 2021

Manhattan Experience Center's TCR rose 48.7 from 2.7 in 2018 to 51.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 6060.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 8.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423620 · New York, NY ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 2.7 · 121% of ind

  • DART 22.8 DART
  • RANK P47
  • PHOTO Washer Specialties
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Washer Specialties (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Manhattan Experience Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Manhattan Experience Center averages 2.7 TCR (121% of the Appliances, household-type (except water heaters, heating stoves (i.e., noncooking)), gas and electric, merchant BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Manhattan Experience Center TCR series: 2018=2.7 · 2019=2.6 · 2020=6060.6 · 2021=51.3 · BLS 2.2

Where Manhattan Experience Center falls in its industry

91 Appliances, household-type (ex establishments

Safer than 47% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Manhattan Experience Center (42 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Manhattan Experience Center
Manhattan Experience Center (42 employees, TCR 2.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 75 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Manhattan Experience Center has fewer employees than the Appliances, household-type (except water median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 51.3 22.8 5 4 0
2020 6060.6 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.6 2.6 1 0 0
2018 2.7 2.7 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423620 · NY · New York

91 Appliances, household-type (except water heaters, heating stoves (i.e., noncooking)), gas and electric, merchant employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 1,952 employers in New York, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Washer Specialties 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pana Pacific 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beverly Hills 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Litex Industries. Limited 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE W D Henry & Sons Inc 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kreher Sunrise Farms LLC 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genex Cooperative - Ithaca 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE IA Construction Management Inc. 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Grossman School of Medicine 16,280 FTE
CITY-NEAR Memorial Hospital Corporation (MEM) 14,781 FTE
CITY-NEAR NYU Langone Hospitals 12,389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mount Sinai Medical Center 11,845 FTE
NAT-TCR Hubbell 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bayside Health and Rehabilitation Center 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MTM Recognition OKC 2.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Rose SL-Avon 2.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pro Clean Janitorial Services, Inc 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris United LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE T159 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Envinty 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.