Health insurance carriers, direct · North Carolina

BCBSNC Telecommuters

Durham, NC · ~3,033 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
0.5
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BCBSNC Telecommuters runs at 8% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Health insurance carriers, direct workplace, earning a grade A.

BCBSNC Telecommuters: 0.0 TCR = 8% of Health insurance carriers, direct BLS 0.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BCBSNC Telecommuters safety composite

BCBSNC Telecommuters scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 94% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 94% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 69% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

BCBSNC Telecommuters held a steady TCR band

BCBSNC Telecommuters's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.1 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.1 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 524114 · Durham, NC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 0.0 · 8% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/13
  • PHOTO MN006 MINNETONKA-980…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~3,033 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: MN006 MINNETONKA-9800 HEALTH CARE LN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

BCBSNC Telecommuters in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BCBSNC Telecommuters averages 0.0 TCR (8% of the Health insurance carriers, direct BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BCBSNC Telecommuters TCR series: 2016=0.1 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=0.2 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 0.5

Where BCBSNC Telecommuters falls in its industry

162 Health insurance carriers, dir establishments

Safer than 94% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 13 Health insurance carriers, dir employers in North Carolina.

BCBSNC Telecommuters (3,033 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 360 employees and a TCR of 0.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate BCBSNC Telecommuters
BCBSNC Telecommuters (3,033 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 360 employees and a TCR of 0.5

BCBSNC Telecommuters has more employees than the Health insurance carriers, direct median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.2 0.1 3 0 0
2017 0.1 0.0 0 1 0
2016 0.1 0.0 1 0 1

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

524114 · NC · Durham

162 Health insurance carriers, direct employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 530 employers in Durham, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR MN006 MINNETONKA-9800 HEALTH CARE LN 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2573-MN022 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR MN101 EDEN PRAIRIE-11000 OPTUM CIR 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2573-MN017 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE GSK Field and Pharma Sales Field and Remote Workers 3,052 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfspeed - Durham, NC 3,013 FTE
STATE-SIZE ELECT-ELECTIONS 2,983 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1114-Atrium Health Cabarrus (1114) 3,087 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University 23,871 FTE
CITY-NEAR Duke University Hospital 11,048 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSK/ViiV Pharma Field Sales 2,700 FTE
CITY-NEAR SMB 2,353 FTE
NAT-TCR Takeda: Bannockburn 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Center for Research & Technology 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR The STI Group Fab. Orange 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR South Campus 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Juno Beach Office 3,032 FTE
NAT-SIZE Connecticut Children's Medical Center 3,035 FTE
NAT-SIZE North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : MCO1 3,036 FTE
NAT-SIZE 6354-FL20 3,030 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.