Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing · California

B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc.

Westminster, CA · ~115 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc. runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc.: 2.5 TCR = 77% of Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc. safety composite

B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.55 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc.: 1.8 → 3.3 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 3.3 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2020

B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc.'s TCR rose 1.5 from 1.8 in 2018 to 3.3 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Westminster, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.5 · 77% of ind

  • DART 1.1 DART
  • RANK #53/104
  • PHOTO Moog, Inc. - Torrance
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~115 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Moog, Inc. - Torrance (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc. averages 2.5 TCR (77% of the Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc. TCR series: 2018=1.8 · 2020=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc. falls in its industry

650 Other Aircraft Parts and Auxil establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #53 safest of 104 Other Aircraft Parts and Auxil employers in California.

B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc. (115 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc.
B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc. (115 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

B/E Aerospace Machined Products Inc. has fewer employees than the Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equip median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 3.3 1.1 3 0 0
2018 1.8 1.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · CA · Westminster

650 Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 64 employers in Westminster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Moog, Inc. - Torrance 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SNA - Auburn 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midway Machining Company LLC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ancra Group : ANCRA Azusa 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Buona Terra Farming 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE ROSE & A FLC 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE CA-CSBU - Covina 115 FTE
STATE-SIZE Visalia Base - Bld: 0080 - 15 115 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mission Palms Healthcare Center 12,800 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 384 811 FTE
CITY-NEAR RRL CORP 611 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2253-H4842 438 FTE
NAT-TCR 0280 - Doors-North Wilkesboro 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 522 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Ross store 339 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Consolidated Pipe & Supply Co. Inc. - Piperton, TN 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE 838 Chicago, Il 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hebrew Home & Hospital 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aitkin High School 115 FTE
NAT-SIZE 395 S. Industrial Blvd - Integer TRN 115 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.