Homes for the aged with nursing care · California

Mission Palms Healthcare Center

Westminster, CA · ~12,800 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Mission Palms Healthcare Center runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Homes for the aged with nursing care workplace, earning a grade A.

Mission Palms Healthcare Center: 2.0 TCR = 30% of Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Mission Palms Healthcare Center safety composite

Mission Palms Healthcare Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

79/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−72.7

2020→2023

Mission Palms Healthcare Center injury rate improved

Mission Palms Healthcare Center's TCR fell 72.7 from 72.7 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 72.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=72.7 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=1.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Westminster, CA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #40/739
  • PHOTO Mercy Medical Center…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~12,800 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mercy Medical Center North Iowa-West Campus-Including Pediatric Clinic-MHS-IA/NE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Mission Palms Healthcare Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Mission Palms Healthcare Center averages 2.0 TCR (30% of the Homes for the aged with nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Mission Palms Healthcare Center TCR series: 2020=72.7 · 2021=4.9 · 2022=1 · 2023=0 · BLS 6.5

Where Mission Palms Healthcare Center falls in its industry

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursin establishments

Safer than 92% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #40 safest of 739 Homes for the aged with nursin employers in California.

Mission Palms Healthcare Center (12,800 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05,00010,00015,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Mission Palms Healthcare Center
Mission Palms Healthcare Center (12,800 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Mission Palms Healthcare Center has more employees than the Homes for the aged with nursing care median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 2 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 3 102 0
2021 4.9 3.9 3 2 0
2020 72.7 70.9 4 75 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CA · Westminster

15,252 Homes for the aged with nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 64 employers in Westminster, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mercy Medical Center North Iowa-West Campus-Including Pediatric Clinic-MHS-IA/NE 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Raleigh Court Operations LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carolina Burke Operator LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oaks at Avon 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE NA-US-CA-Fremont-Factory 12,707 FTE
STATE-SIZE 6017-USA UNITED STATES - WAH - CA 13,009 FTE
STATE-SIZE DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
STATE-SIZE Genentech SSF 13,259 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 384 811 FTE
CITY-NEAR RRL CORP 611 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2253-H4842 438 FTE
CITY-NEAR H4842 KINDRED HOSPITAL WESTMINSTER 419 FTE
NAT-TCR SERVICE TRANSPORT - Houston, TX 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR E. Cornell Malone Corporation 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Snavely's Mill, Inc. - Mill Hall, PA 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR L. F. Jennings, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center 12,804 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wynn Las Vegas 12,830 FTE
NAT-SIZE MO002 12,691 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Connecticut, Storrs 12,616 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.