Scaffold erecting and dismantling · California

Bear Scaffold and Services

Alviso, CA · ~47 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bear Scaffold and Services runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Scaffold erecting and dismantling workplace, earning a grade D.

Bear Scaffold and Services: 3.4 TCR = 121% of Scaffold erecting and dismantling BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bear Scaffold and Services safety composite

Bear Scaffold and Services scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.2

2017→2024

Bear Scaffold and Services injury rate improved

Bear Scaffold and Services's TCR fell 2.2 from 2.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.2 · 2018=2.0 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Alviso, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.4 · 121% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #87/171
  • PHOTO ASAP Installations LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ASAP Installations LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bear Scaffold and Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bear Scaffold and Services averages 3.4 TCR (121% of the Scaffold erecting and dismantling BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Bear Scaffold and Services TCR series: 2017=2.2 · 2018=2 · 2019=1.3 · 2020=5.9 · 2021=2.3 · 2022=4.7 · 2023=8.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Bear Scaffold and Services falls in its industry

1,634 Scaffold erecting and dismantl establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #87 safest of 171 Scaffold erecting and dismantl employers in California.

Bear Scaffold and Services (47 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Bear Scaffold and Services
Bear Scaffold and Services (47 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Bear Scaffold and Services has fewer employees than the Scaffold erecting and dismantling median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 8.8 8.8 4 0 0
2022 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2021 2.3 2.3 1 0 0
2020 5.9 3.9 3 0 0
2019 1.3 1.3 1 0 0
2018 2.0 2.0 1 0 0
2017 2.2 2.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · CA · Alviso

1,634 Scaffold erecting and dismantling employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 6 employers in Alviso, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ASAP Installations LLC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR U. S. Pavement Services LLC 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Murphree Paving 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR DMI PAVING & SEALCOATING 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bowles Farming Company,Inc. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ruiz Farm Labor 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fresh Valley Harvesting, LLC. 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Timothy & Viguie C.S.V. 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bear Electrical Solutions, LLC 93 FTE
CITY-NEAR 320 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bear Insulation, Inc. 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR Custom Scaffold, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-TCR Shop Rite of Washington 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Oral Roberts University 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Round Lake Area Park District 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR S09103 - Houston Westside SS 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Linde 929 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Kyocera International Incorporated-Display 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Spokane WA Yard 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Harris Tire Co. Inc. 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.