Tubes, electronic, manufacturing · Michigan

Kyocera International Incorporated-Display

Plymouth, MI · ~47 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Kyocera International Incorporated-Display runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tubes, electronic, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade A.

Kyocera International Incorporated-Display: 0.8 TCR = 24% of Tubes, electronic, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Kyocera International Incorporated-Display safety composite

Kyocera International Incorporated-Display scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.4

2018→2024

Kyocera International Incorporated-Display injury rate improved

Kyocera International Incorporated-Display's TCR fell 2.4 from 2.4 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=2.4 · 2019=2.3 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334419 · Plymouth, MI AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/7
  • PHOTO Alpha Productions Te…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alpha Productions Technologies, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Kyocera International Incorporated-Display in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Kyocera International Incorporated-Display averages 0.8 TCR (24% of the Tubes, electronic, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Kyocera International Incorporated-Display TCR series: 2018=2.4 · 2019=2.3 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Kyocera International Incorporated-Display falls in its industry

334 Tubes, electronic, manufacturi establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 7 Tubes, electronic, manufacturi employers in Michigan.

Kyocera International Incorporated-Display (47 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate Kyocera International Incorporated-Display
Kyocera International Incorporated-Display (47 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 108 employees and a TCR of 1.8

Kyocera International Incorporated-Display has fewer employees than the Tubes, electronic, manufacturing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 2.3 0.0 0 1 0
2018 2.4 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334419 · MI · Plymouth

334 Tubes, electronic, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 139 employers in Plymouth, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alpha Productions Technologies, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Teledyne FLIR Defense, Inc. (Bozeman MT) 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CAES Systems LLC. 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Excelitas Technologies Corp. 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nash Greenhouses, LLC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Red Arrow Dairy 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE SEMCO Energy Gas Company - BC 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Operations and Maintenance 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR ADIENT LLC Headquarters 1,544 FTE
CITY-NEAR Webasto Roof Systems Inc. 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR Comprehensive Care Services, Inc. 825 FTE
CITY-NEAR 11021 648 FTE
NAT-TCR PacBio Menlo Park 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Fremont Heat Treat Division 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Findlay 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Burton Corporation 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Linde 929 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Homewood Suites - Las Vegas Airport 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bakersfield Location 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bear Scaffold and Services 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.