Homeowners' associations · California

Bear Valley Springs Association

Tehachapi, CA · ~172 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Bear Valley Springs Association runs at 340% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Homeowners' associations workplace, earning a grade F.

Bear Valley Springs Association: 7.1 TCR = 340% of Homeowners' associations BLS 2.1 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Bear Valley Springs Association safety composite

Bear Valley Springs Association scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

Fatalities
C 0

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.1

2023→2024

Bear Valley Springs Association injury rate improved

Bear Valley Springs Association's TCR fell 10.1 from 12.2 in 2023 to 2.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 12.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.13× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=12.2 · 2024=2.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 813990 · Tehachapi, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.1 · 340% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #2/4
  • PHOTO BIGHORN Homeowners A…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 15 inj
  • SIZE ~172 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: BIGHORN Homeowners Association (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Bear Valley Springs Association in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Bear Valley Springs Association averages 7.1 TCR (340% of the Homeowners' associations BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

Bear Valley Springs Association TCR series: 2023=12.2 · 2024=2.1 · BLS 2.1

Where Bear Valley Springs Association falls in its industry

22 Homeowners' associations establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 4 Homeowners' associations employers in California.

Bear Valley Springs Association (172 employees, TCR 7.1) among 9 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 10 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate NV - Summerlin Association ManagementBIGHORN Homeowners AssociationFontanelleGirl Scouts - Arizona Cactus-Pine Council, IncSUN CITY PALM DESERT COMMUNITY ASSOCIATIONVistana Beach ClubPine Mountain Club Property Owners AssociationHealth and Recreation Center21st Century CoopBear Valley Springs Association
Bear Valley Springs Association (172 employees, TCR 7.1) among 9 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 39 employees and a TCR of 4.3

Bear Valley Springs Association has more employees than the Homeowners' associations median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.1 0.9 5 2 0
2023 12.2 12.2 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

813990 · CA · Tehachapi

22 Homeowners' associations employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 26 employers in Tehachapi, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR BIGHORN Homeowners Association 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR RadissonCommunity Association, Inc. 7.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Princeton Windrows Condo Assoc 7.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fontanelle 6.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 6458-ZOAK 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oceanside 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE 0289 - Cerritos Bloomfield Avenue 172 FTE
STATE-SIZE Channing House 172 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Correctional Institution 1,374 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 311 787 FTE
CITY-NEAR World Wind and Solar 353 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4317 284 FTE
NAT-TCR Kyowe - Owensboro 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Bridge at Sandpoint 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Mission Foods Distribution Center 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Griffith - Allied 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Omni Richmond Hotel 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE HME 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Milar - Lansing Airport 172 FTE
NAT-SIZE Txabi - Abilene 172 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.