Mechanical contractors · Texas

Beard Integrated Systems

Dallas, TX · ~228 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Beard Integrated Systems runs at 24% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Mechanical contractors workplace, earning a grade A.

Beard Integrated Systems: 0.7 TCR = 24% of Mechanical contractors BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Beard Integrated Systems safety composite

Beard Integrated Systems scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

71/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 60% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Beard Integrated Systems held a steady TCR band

Beard Integrated Systems's TCR held near 0.3 from 0.6 in 2016 to 0.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=0.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Dallas, TX AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.7 · 24% of ind

  • DART 0.3 DART
  • RANK #47/408
  • PHOTO Ryan Fireprotection …
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~228 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ryan Fireprotection of Ohio, LLC dba Cincinnati Dayton Fire Protection (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Beard Integrated Systems in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Beard Integrated Systems averages 0.7 TCR (24% of the Mechanical contractors BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Beard Integrated Systems TCR series: 2016=0.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=0.5 · 2020=0.4 · 2021=0.3 · 2022=0.6 · 2023=0.3 · BLS 2.8

Where Beard Integrated Systems falls in its industry

5,793 Mechanical contractors establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 408 Mechanical contractors employers in Texas.

Beard Integrated Systems (228 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Beard Integrated Systems
Beard Integrated Systems (228 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Beard Integrated Systems has more employees than the Mechanical contractors median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.3 0.3 1 0 0
2022 0.6 0.3 1 1 0
2021 0.3 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.4 0.4 1 0 0
2019 0.5 0.5 1 0 0
2018 2.9 1.5 8 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.6 0.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · TX · Dallas

5,793 Mechanical contractors employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 2,187 employers in Dallas, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ryan Fireprotection of Ohio, LLC dba Cincinnati Dayton Fire Protection 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR BT Houston 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR USA AR North Little Rock 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kartechner Brothers LLC 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Aspen Utility Company, LLC 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knife River Corporation South Waco 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Nelson Bros. Ready Mix, Ltd. 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Supreme Roofing, LP 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR AECOM DCS (US Operations) 15,100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rexel USA, Inc 8,356 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1 CHILDRENS MEDICAL CENTER OF DALLAS 6,147 FTE
CITY-NEAR HDQ - Headquarters 5,764 FTE
NAT-TCR Trenton Systems, Inc. 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Bluestem Arkansas LLC 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Veritiv Operating Company - VA035 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR FW PERRY proTECH 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Corporate Central Distribution 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clearwater Paper Elwood LLC 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gettle Incorporated 228 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.