General warehousing and storage · Maryland

Corporate Central Distribution

Glen Burnie, MD · ~228 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
5.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Corporate Central Distribution runs at 32% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical General warehousing and storage workplace, earning a grade A.

Corporate Central Distribution: 1.9 TCR = 32% of General warehousing and storage BLS 5.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Corporate Central Distribution safety composite

Corporate Central Distribution scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 65% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2018→2023

Corporate Central Distribution injury rate improved

Corporate Central Distribution's TCR fell 2.5 from 3.4 in 2018 to 0.9 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 3.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.48× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=3.4 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 493110 · Glen Burnie, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.9 · 32% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #28/148
  • PHOTO Kalamazoo
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~228 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kalamazoo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Corporate Central Distribution in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Corporate Central Distribution averages 1.9 TCR (32% of the General warehousing and storage BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Corporate Central Distribution TCR series: 2018=3.4 · 2019=2.5 · 2020=2.4 · 2021=1.4 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.9 · BLS 5.8

Where Corporate Central Distribution falls in its industry

9,477 General warehousing and storag establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #28 safest of 148 General warehousing and storag employers in Maryland.

Corporate Central Distribution (228 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Corporate Central Distribution
Corporate Central Distribution (228 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 92 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Corporate Central Distribution has more employees than the General warehousing and storage median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.9 0.9 1 0 0
2022 0.7 0.0 1 0 0
2021 1.4 0.0 2 0 0
2020 2.4 1.4 5 0 0
2019 2.5 0.8 6 0 0
2018 3.4 0.9 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

493110 · MD · Glen Burnie

9,477 General warehousing and storage employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 127 employers in Glen Burnie, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kalamazoo 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Alum Creek 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Eagle Outfitters Retail Distribution West 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dallas - 3737 Duncanville Road 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Coty Inc. DBA Noxell Corp 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Appleton North 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE WM 1717 228 FTE
STATE-SIZE Roland Park Place 228 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical Center 2,896 FTE
CITY-NEAR MDOT/MVA 1,631 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vision Technologies LLC. 551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bello Mahcre 462 FTE
NAT-TCR Teamvantage Molding 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Taylor Bros. Construction Co., Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mercury Marine Plant 36 (Racing) - Taycheedah, WI 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #297 RICHMOND, KY 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Beard Integrated Systems 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clearwater Paper Elwood LLC 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems 228 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gettle Incorporated 228 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.