Employer
Beaumont Chemical Plant
Safety Grade
A
Avg TCR
0.8
per 100 workers
Inspections
7
years on record
Rubber Manufacturing · Texas
2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Beaumont Chemical Plant

Open-data reference.

BEAUMONT, TX | Rubber Manufacturing

~333 avg employees | 7 years of OSHA data

A
Excellent Safety Record
Avg TCR
0.8
per 100 workers/yr
Industry Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
Total Injuries
14
across all years
Fatalities
1
across all years

Beaumont Chemical Plant has an average TCR of 0.8, which is 24% of the industry average (3.3) for Rubber Manufacturing. This is significantly better than average.

Safety Insights for Beaumont Chemical Plant

Beaumont Chemical Plant operates an establishment with approximately 333 full-time equivalent workers in BEAUMONT, TX, classified under the Rubber Manufacturing industry (NAICS 325212). Across 7 years of mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reporting, this employer has accumulated 14 recordable injuries, 5 occupational illnesses, and 1 workplace fatality. The average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 0.8 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year provides the anchor metric for the A letter grade (Excellent Safety Record).

Benchmarked against the Bureau of Labor Statistics industry average of 3.3 for Rubber Manufacturing, Beaumont Chemical Plant's workforce experiences 24% of the typical injury burden. This ratio matters because TCR already normalizes for hours worked — a 200,000-hour exposure base equals roughly 100 full-time workers — so establishments with very different headcounts can be compared directly. A TCR below the benchmark signals that controls, training, or automation may be outperforming peers.

Multi-year trend analysis is the single most reliable signal here: a one-year spike could reflect a single severe event, whereas sustained elevation across 7 reporting cycles points to systemic hazard exposure. Readers evaluating Beaumont Chemical Plant as an employer, contractor, investment, or regulatory target should examine the yearly DART rate (days away, restricted, or transferred), the fatality count of 1, and any year-over-year deterioration shown in the table below. All figures come directly from employer-submitted OSHA Form 300A summaries — there is no modeling, estimation, or third-party adjustment layered on top of the government data.

Verify This Employer with OSHA

All injury, illness, and fatality figures on this page are sourced from Beaumont Chemical Plant's own mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source — name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.

Verify on OSHA Establishment Search

Source: U.S. Department of Labor — OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 325212 — Rubber Manufacturing.

DART Rate — Transparent Calculation (2024)

DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.

2 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 700,479 hours worked = 0.57 DART

Methodology: 29 CFR 1904 — OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping

Cross-Validating Context — Establishment vs Industry vs State

Benchmark TCR Source
Beaumont Chemical Plant (this establishment) 0.78 OSHA ITA Form 300A, 7-year avg
Fluoro rubbers manufacturing industry avg 3.30 BLS IIF, NAICS 325212
Texas state avg (all industries) 11.19 OSHA ITA, state-level rollup

Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics — Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program

Reportable Incident Timeline

Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Beaumont Chemical Plant to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.

Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) — inspection case-number records

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.6 0.6 2 0 0
2023 1.1 0.6 3 1 0
2022 1.1 0.0 3 1 1
2021 1.7 0.8 4 2 0
2020 0.6 0.3 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.3 0.0 0 1 0

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Beaumont Chemical Plant's safety grade?
Beaumont Chemical Plant has a safety grade of A (Excellent Safety Record). This grade is based on their average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 0.8 compared to the BLS industry benchmark of 3.3 for Rubber Manufacturing.
How is the safety grade calculated?
Safety grades are calculated by comparing an employer's average Total Case Rate (TCR) — the number of workplace injuries and illnesses per 100 full-time workers per year — against the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) industry benchmark. Grade A means significantly below average injury rates; grade F means significantly above average.
How many injuries has Beaumont Chemical Plant reported?
Beaumont Chemical Plant has reported 14 total injuries and 1 fatalities across 7 years of OSHA data (2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018). This data comes from mandatory OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA) reports.
Where does PlainSafetyScore get its data?
All safety data comes from OSHA's Injury Tracking Application (ITA), which collects mandatory establishment-level injury and illness reports from employers with 250+ employees or those in high-hazard industries. Industry benchmarks are from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program.

Explore More Safety Data

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Related

Data sourced from official U.S. government datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial