Industry profile · NAICS 325212

Fluoro rubbers manufacturing

Workplace injury rates across 101 OSHA-reporting establishments in this industry, 2016–2024.

101
Employers
3.9
Avg TCR
3.3
BLS benchmark
1,117
Injuries

The industry picture

Employers in Fluoro rubbers manufacturing average 3.9 recordable injuries per 100 workers, 1.2 times the BLS national benchmark of 3.3.

3.9
avg TCR · reporting employers
3.3
BLS national benchmark
101
employers reporting
1,117
recordable injuries

OSHA-reporting establishments skew toward larger, higher-hazard sites, so the reporting average runs above the BLS all-establishment benchmark.

What Fluoro rubbers manufacturing Safety Data Reveals

The Fluoro rubbers manufacturing sector (NAICS 325212) encompasses 101 distinct employer establishments currently reporting to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Across this cohort, workers have logged 1,117 recordable injuries during the 2016–2024 reporting window, producing an industry-weighted average Total Case Rate (TCR) of 3.9 injuries per 100 full-time workers per year. Because OSHA's ITA mandates submission from establishments with 250+ employees plus all high-hazard industries at 20+ employees, this dataset represents a structural slice of U.S. workplace risk rather than a voluntary sample.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes a separate national benchmark TCR of 3.3 for this NAICS code, derived from the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Comparing the two, the ITA-reported rate of 3.9 is higher than the BLS benchmark, a gap that typically widens when the industry contains many large, high-exposure establishments required to file ITA reports. Employers in the table below are sorted so you can see how far individual establishments deviate from both the industry average and the national benchmark.

The practical value of industry-level safety data is threefold. First, jobseekers can gauge whether a prospective employer is better or worse than its industry peers, not just absolute injury counts, which tilt toward larger payrolls. Second, insurers and workers' compensation carriers use sector TCR as a baseline for experience-modification adjustments. Third, safety professionals benchmark their own programs against the cohort median. Use the grade-sorted employer list below to identify specific establishments within Fluoro rubbers manufacturing that outperform or underperform the sector average, and click through to each record for year-by-year injury, illness, and fatality breakdowns.

Employers in this industry, by injury rate

Page 1 of 3
Employer LocationGradeAvg TCR
Griswold Products LLC Moosup, CT F 16.2
Kraiburg Holding Buford, GA F 15.4
South Bend Modern Molding Mishawaka, IN F 14.6
Gezolan(KRAIBURG)LP Buford, GA F 13.3
Nephron Nitrile, LLC West Columbia, SC F 13.1
BCC Products Franklin, IN F 12.9
Alumilite Galesburg, MI F 9.4
Lavelle Industries Inc, Burlington Burlington, WI F 9.0
Robinson Rubber Products Co Inc. New Hope, MN F 8.7
Gezolan (Kraiburg)LP Buford, GA F 8.5
Smooth-On Inc Macungie, PA F 8.2
SILMIX CA Div Chino, CA F 7.3
Burke Industries (San Jose, CA) San Jose, CA F 7.0
C&M Rubber Company Dayton, OH F 6.9
Polytek - Pomona Pomona, CA F 6.8
Guy Chemical Company, LLC Somerset, PA F 6.6
Zeon Chemicals LP - KY Plant Louisville, KY D 6.2
Urethane Innovators, Inc New Bern, NC D 5.7
Orangeburg - Compound Plant Orangeburg, SC D 5.7
Globe Composite Solutions, LLC Stoughton, MA D 5.7
Roho Inc Belleville, IL D 5.6
Chardon Custom Polymers LLC Chardon, OH D 5.4
Lentus, LLC Elizabethtown, KY D 5.3
Crazy Aarons Enterprises, Inc. Norristown, PA D 5.1
Dacon Industries Jacksonville, TX D 5.0
MikronPMP Ontario, CA D 4.8
Omnova Solutions - Mogadore, Ohio Site Mogadore, OH D 4.8
California Medical Innovations Pomona, CA D 4.7
R. E. Darling Co., Inc. Tucson, AZ D 4.5
Rolenn Mnaufacturing, Inc. Riverside, CA D 4.3
Mannington Mills, Inc. Tracy, CA C 3.9
Lehigh Technologies Tucker, GA C 3.7
Crazy Aaron Enterprises Inc Norristown, PA C 3.7
Elite Elastomers Ripley, MS C 3.7
Zeon Chemicals L. P. Kentucky Plant Louisville, KY C 3.6
SIMTEC Silicone Parts, LLC Miramar, FL C 3.4
HEXPOL Compounding NC Inc. Statesville, NC C 3.4
Bryant Rubber Corporation Long Beach, CA C 3.4
Manufacturing Hanover, MA C 3.3
Bryant Rubber Corporation Harbor City, CA C 3.2
Zeon Chemicals, Hattiesburg Plant Hattiesburg, MS C 3.1
HEXPOL Compounding LLC Burton, OH C 3.0
Hutchinson Body Sealing North America Wytheville, VA C 3.0
Precision Associates, Inc. Minneapolis, MN C 3.0
York Site York, SC C 2.8
Hutchinson Sealing Systems Wytheville, VA C 2.8
Pilot Plant and Semi Works (Chemical Manufacturing) Mogadore, OH C 2.7
SSP Main Ballston Spa, NY C 2.7
Polytek Development Corp. Easton, PA B 2.6
Firestone Polymers Orange Plant Orange, TX B 2.6
Page 1 of 3 Next →
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details. Retrieved and formatted by PlainSafetyScore Editorial

Verify with BLS →

Verify with OSHA →

Working in Fluoro rubbers manufacturing?

This sector averages 3.9 against a BLS benchmark of 3.3 - but individual employers span the full A-to-F range.

Sector figures use the credible-subset mean across reporting employers; a benchmark is not any single establishment's measured rate.

Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.