Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution · South Carolina

BEC- Goose Creek Facility

Goose Creek, SC · ~52 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

BEC- Goose Creek Facility runs at 427% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution workplace, earning a grade F.

BEC- Goose Creek Facility: 5.1 TCR = 427% of Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

BEC- Goose Creek Facility safety composite

BEC- Goose Creek Facility scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2022→2024

BEC- Goose Creek Facility injury rate improved

BEC- Goose Creek Facility's TCR fell 2.8 from 4.8 in 2022 to 1.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 8.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=4.8 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=1.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Goose Creek, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 5.1 · 427% of ind

  • DART 1.9 DART
  • RANK #81/86
  • PHOTO Washington Electric …
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Washington Electric Coop., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

BEC- Goose Creek Facility in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows BEC- Goose Creek Facility averages 5.1 TCR (427% of the Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

BEC- Goose Creek Facility TCR series: 2022=4.8 · 2023=8.7 · 2024=1.9 · BLS 1.2

Where BEC- Goose Creek Facility falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Generation, Tra establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 86 Electric Power Generation, Tra employers in South Carolina.

BEC- Goose Creek Facility (52 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate BEC- Goose Creek Facility
BEC- Goose Creek Facility (52 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

BEC- Goose Creek Facility has fewer employees than the Electric Power Generation, Transmission median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.9 1.9 1 0 0
2023 8.7 6.5 4 0 0
2022 4.8 4.8 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · SC · Goose Creek

2,958 Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 85 employers in Goose Creek, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Washington Electric Coop., Inc. 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Merritt Island Service Center 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gunnison County Electric Association Summary whole company 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jo-Carroll Energy - Elizabeth 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Florence Transmission Substation Complex 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Headquarter's Office 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Broad River Electric Cooperative, Inc. 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Overhead Door Company of Greenville 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR APS-3 KBR 575 FTE
CITY-NEAR APS-3 548 FTE
CITY-NEAR W. International SC, LLC 499 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2928 473 FTE
NAT-TCR 764 Osseo Agronomy 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Sheboygan Wi - 3247 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Encompass Rehabilitation Hospital of the Mid-Cities, LLC 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Carter Express - Huntsville, AL Cross Dock 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Arizona Electrical Apparatus Inc. 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE White Flower Farm Morris 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #1662 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Indian Lake Rehabilitation 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.