Convalescent homes or hospitals for psychiatric patients · Tennessee

Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin

Martin, TN · ~46 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin runs at 407% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or hospitals for psychiatric patients workplace, earning a grade F.

Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin: 15.5 TCR = 407% of Convalescent homes or hospitals for psychiatric patients BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin safety composite

Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin: 8.7 → 16.6 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 35.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.43× in 2021

Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin's TCR rose 7.8 from 8.7 in 2016 to 16.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 35.9 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623220 · Martin, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.5 · 407% of ind

  • DART 6.6 DART
  • RANK #16/16
  • PHOTO Vantage
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~46 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Vantage (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin averages 15.5 TCR (407% of the Convalescent homes or hospitals for psychiatric patients BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=0 · 2019=35.9 · 2020=16.2 · 2021=16.6 · BLS 3.8

Where Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin falls in its industry

1,165 Convalescent homes or hospital establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 16 Convalescent homes or hospital employers in Tennessee.

Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin (46 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin
Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin (46 employees, TCR 15.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Behavioral Healthcare Center at Martin has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or hospitals for psyc median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 16.6 6.6 4 1 0
2020 16.2 4.0 4 0 0
2019 35.9 16.0 9 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 8.7 5.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623220 · TN · Martin

1,165 Convalescent homes or hospitals for psychiatric patients employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 33 employers in Martin, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Vantage 15.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR 41-2 Pacella Park Dr., Randolph, MA 02368 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Campus 15.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR SF - 815 Buena Vista West, SF 15.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Benton County Electric 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gibson County Utility District 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE 670 South Cooper Street 46 FTE
STATE-SIZE JBS Energy Solutions, LLC 46 FTE
CITY-NEAR MTD Consumer Group Martin 1,341 FTE
CITY-NEAR MTD Products Inc 1,316 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 107 301 FTE
CITY-NEAR 107 280 FTE
NAT-TCR PCC Community Markets Ballard 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Princeton - Fire and Rescue Department 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR 6458-ZLAF 15.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Commercial Lumber & Pallet Co 15.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE St. Clair, MI 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transteck Inc. - New Stanton 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE ADESA Colorado Springs 46 FTE
NAT-SIZE All American Title Co., Inc 46 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.